ArticleTrends in hearing
The Role of Place Cues in Voluntary Stream Segregation for Cochlear Implant Users.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sequential auditory grouping reduces binaural pitch fusion in listeners with normal hearing, hearing aids, and cochlear implantsa).The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Contribution of Temporal Fine Structure Cues to Concurrent Vowel Identification and Perception of Zebra Speech.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2024Article
- Spectral Grouping of Electrically Encoded Sound Predicts Speech-in-Noise Performance in Cochlear Implantees.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023Article
- Auditory stream segregation of amplitude-modulated narrowband noise in cochlear implant users and individuals with normal hearing.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Auditory Stream Segregation Can Be Modeled by Neural Competition in Cochlear Implant Listeners.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019Article
- Auditory Stream Segregation and Selective Attention for Cochlear Implant Listeners: Evidence From Behavioral Measures and Event-Related Potentials.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- The Relationship of Pitch Discrimination with Segregation of Tonal and Speech Streams for Cochlear Implant Users.Trends in hearingArticle
- The Role of Temporal Cues in Voluntary Stream Segregation for Cochlear Implant Users.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sequential stream segregation by cochlear implant (CI) listeners was investigated using a temporal delay detection task composed of a sequence of regularly presented bursts of pulses on a single electrode (B) interleaved with an irregular sequence (A) presented on a different electrode. In half of the trials, a delay was added to the last burst of the regular B sequence, and the listeners were asked to detect this delay. As a jitter was added to the period between consecutive A bursts, time judgments between the A and B sequences provided an unreliable cue to perform the task. Thus, the segregation of the A and B sequences should improve performance. In Experiment 1, the electrode separation and the sequence duration were varied to clarify whether place cues help CI listeners to voluntarily segregate sounds and whether a two-stream percept needs time to build up. Results suggested that place cues can facilitate the segregation of sequential sounds if enough time is provided to build up a two-stream percept. In Experiment 2, the duration of the sequence was fixed, and only the electrode separation was varied to estimate the fission boundary. Most listeners were able to segregate the sounds for separations of three or more electrodes, and some listeners could segregate sounds coming from adjacent electrodes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.