ArticlePhysical review. E2017
Extending electrostatics of dielectric spheres to arbitrary charge distributions with applications to biosystems.
Article in Physical review. E, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Arbitrary-Shape Dielectric Particles Interacting in the Linearized Poisson-Boltzmann Framework: An Analytical Treatment.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022Article
- Rigorous treatment of pairwise and many-body electrostatic interactions among dielectric spheres at the Debye-Hückel level.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2021Article
- Electrostatics of charged dielectric spheres with application to biological systems. III. Rigorous ionic screening at the Debye-Hückel level.Physical review. E · 2020Article
- Surface charge method for molecular surfaces with curved areal elements I. Spherical triangles.Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A previously developed classical model of electrostatic interactions, based on a formalism of dielectric spheres, which has been found to have surprising accuracy for S state atoms, is extended by allowing higher-order moments of the intrinsic charge distribution. Two methods to introduce the charge distribution (point moments at the center vs surface charge) are shown to be equivalent and are compared with another common model for polarizable atoms that utilizes polarizable point dipoles. Unlike the polarizable point dipole model, the polarizable spheres models do not suffer from a divergence at small separation of atoms and are easily generalized to higher multipoles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.