Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29346791›Full record

ArticleGerontology2018

Social and Behavioural Determinants of the Difference in Survival among Older Adults in Japan and England.

Jun Aida, Noriko Cable, Paola Zaninotto, Toru Tsuboya, Georgios Tsakos, Yusuke Matsuyama, Kanade Ito, Ken Osaka, Katsunori Kondo, Michael G Marmot and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gerontology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of prognosis and safety of pacemaker implantation in patients aged less than or 85 years and older.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jun AidaCenter for Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Clinical Research, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Japan.
Noriko CableDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Paola ZaninottoDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Toru TsuboyaDepartment of International and Community Oral Health, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Japan.
Georgios TsakosDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Yusuke MatsuyamaDepartment of International and Community Oral Health, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Japan.
Kanade ItoDivision of Oral Health Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, School of Health and Social Services, Saitama Prefectural University, Koshigaya, Japan.
Ken OsakaDepartment of International and Community Oral Health, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Japan.
Katsunori KondoCenter for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Michael G MarmotDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Richard G WattDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Project-001R01AG017644 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF LONDON INST OF NEUROLOGY · PI Andrew Steptoe · 2000 to 2026
$56.2M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG017644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA rapidly ageing population presents major challenges to health and social care services. Cross-country comparative studies on survival among older adults are limited. In addition, Japan, the country with the longest life expectancy, is rarely included in these cross-country comparisons.

objectiveWe examined the relative contributions of social and behavioural factors on the differences in survival among older people in Japan and England.

methodsWe used data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES; n = 13,176) and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA; n = 5,551) to analyse all-cause mortality up to 9.4 years from the baseline. Applying Laplace regression models, the 15th survival percentile difference was estimated.

resultsDuring the follow-up, 31.3% of women and 38.6% of men in the ELSA died, whereas 19.3% of women and 31.3% of men in the JAGES died. After adjusting for age and baseline health status, JAGES participants had longer survival than ELSA participants by 318.8 days for women and by 131.6 days for men. Family-based social relationships contributed to 105.4 days longer survival in JAGES than ELSA men. Fewer friendship-based social relationships shortened the JAGES men's survival by 45.4 days compared to ELSA men. Currently not being a smoker contributed to longer survival for JAGES women (197.7 days) and ELSA men (46.6 days), and having lower BMI reduced the survival of JAGES participants by 129.0 days for women and by 212.2 days for men.

conclusionCompared to participants in England, Japanese older people lived longer mainly because of non-smoking for women and family-based social relationships for men. In contrast, a lower rate of underweight, men's better friendship-based social relationships, and a lower smoking rate contributed to survival among participants in England.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorSocial SupportAgedAged, 80 and overAgingBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesCross-Cultural ComparisonEnglandFemaleHealthy AgingHumansJapanLongevityLongitudinal StudiesMaleResilience M5 Protection PlusResin CementsCohort studyCross-country comparative studyLaplace regressionMortalitySocial relationships

Identifiers

PMID29346791
PMCPMC5969072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.