Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29346654›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2018

Evaluation of system mapping approaches in identifying patient safety risks.

Mecit Can Emre Simsekler, James R Ward, P John Clarkson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Enhancing patient safety in the emergency care of poisoned patients: a participatory systems approach.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evaluating inputs of failure modes and effects analysis in identifying patient safety risks.International journal of health care quality assurance · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mecit Can Emre SimseklerDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi Campus, Abu Dhabi 127788, United Arab Emirates.
James R WardEngineering Department, Engineering Design Centre, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.
P John ClarksonEngineering Department, Engineering Design Centre, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBKhalifa University of Science and Technology · AE

Funding

Department of Health EOECLAHRC-2014-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWhile many system mapping approaches (SMAs) have been broadly used in safety-critical industries, few have so far been employed in the healthcare field to assist in the identification of patient safety risks. In this study, we evaluated a set of system modelling approaches to assess their potential contribution to the identification of risks affecting patient safety. The aim was to gain a greater understanding of the practical application of system modelling approaches with the help of the risk categorization framework developed in this study.

settingWe conducted this study in a newly established Adult Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) service at Cambridge and Peterborough Foundation Trust. STUDY

participantsEight key stakeholders of the chosen service, including clinicians, managers and administrative staff, were individually asked to evaluate a set of pre-defined six SMAs according to their usefulness in identifying patient safety risks through interview-based questionnaires.

resultsIt was found that each SMA could be useful in the chosen healthcare service in different ways. Further, specific types of diagrams were selected by stakeholders as more useful than others in identifying different sources of risks within the given system.

conclusionsThe results of the evaluation showed that the system diagram is the most useful SMA in risk identification within the given system, while limited time, resources and experience of stakeholders with SMAs may present possible obstacles for their potential use in the healthcare field in future.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityHumansModels, OrganizationalQuality Assurance, Health CareRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSafety ManagementUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID29346654
PMCPMC6104811
OpenAlexW2783333466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.