Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29346618›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

Evidence of Adaptive Evolution and Relaxed Constraints in Sex-Biased Genes of South American and West Indies Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae).

Carlos Congrains, Emeline B Campanini, Felipe R Torres, Víctor B Rezende, Aline M Nakamura, Janaína L de Oliveira, André L A Lima, Samira Chahad-Ehlers, Iderval S Sobrinho, Reinaldo A de Brito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nonadaptive molecular evolution of seminal fluid proteins in Drosophila.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Carlos CongrainsDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Emeline B CampaniniDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Felipe R TorresDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Víctor B RezendeDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Aline M NakamuraDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Janaína L de OliveiraDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
André L A LimaDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Samira Chahad-EhlersDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Iderval S SobrinhoUnidade Jatobá, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Jataí, GO, Brazil.
Reinaldo A de BritoDepartamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated that genes differentially expressed between sexes (sex-biased genes) tend to evolve faster than unbiased genes, particularly in males. The reason for this accelerated evolution is not clear, but several explanations have involved adaptive and nonadaptive mechanisms. Furthermore, the differences of sex-biased expression patterns of closely related species are also little explored out of Drosophila. To address the evolutionary processes involved with sex-biased expression in species with incipient differentiation, we analyzed male and female transcriptomes of Anastrepha fraterculus and Anastrepha obliqua, a pair of species that have diverged recently, likely in the presence of gene flow. Using these data, we inferred differentiation indexes and evolutionary rates and tested for signals of selection in thousands of genes expressed in head and reproductive transcriptomes from both species. Our results indicate that sex-biased and reproductive-biased genes evolve faster than unbiased genes in both species, which is due to both adaptive pressure and relaxed constraints. Furthermore, among male-biased genes evolving under positive selection, we identified some related to sexual functions such as courtship behavior and fertility. These findings suggest that sex-biased genes may have played important roles in the establishment of reproductive isolation between these species, due to a combination of selection and drift, and unveil a plethora of genetic markers useful for more studies in these species and their differentiation.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, InsectAnimalsFemaleGene FlowMaleReproductive IsolationSelection, GeneticSex CharacteristicsTephritidaeTranscriptomeevolutionary ratesfraterculus grouppositive selectionrelaxed constraintsRNA-seqsex-biased gene expression

Identifiers

PMID29346618
PMCPMC5786236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.