Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29346583›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2018

DataMed - an open source discovery index for finding biomedical datasets.

Xiaoling Chen, Anupama E Gururaj, Burak Ozyurt, Ruiling Liu, Ergin Soysal, Trevor Cohen, Firat Tiryaki, Yueling Li, Nansu Zong, Min Jiang and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. ImmuneData: an integrated data discovery system for immunology data repositories.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Xiaoling ChenSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Anupama E GururajSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Burak OzyurtCenter for Research in Biological Systems.
Ruiling LiuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Ergin SoysalSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Trevor CohenSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Firat TiryakiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Yueling LiCenter for Research in Biological Systems.
Nansu ZongDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Min JiangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Deevakar RogithSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Mandana SalimiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Hyeon-Eui KimDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Philippe Rocca-Serrae-Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltrane-Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Claudiu FarcasDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Todd JohnsonSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Ron MargolisNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
George AlterUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Susanna-Assunta Sansonee-Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ian M ForeNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lucila Ohno-MachadoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jeffrey S GretheCenter for Research in Biological Systems.
Hua XuSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

BioCADDIE: Biomedical and healthCAre Data Discovery and Indexing Engine centerU24AI117966 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2014 to 2016
$10.9M
REACTIVE INTERMEDIATES OF ENZYMATIC REACTIONSR01GM039754 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI RICHARD, JOHN P · 1993 to 2012
$3.9M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I000771/1NIAID NIH HHS U24 AI117966NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM039754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFinding relevant datasets is important for promoting data reuse in the biomedical domain, but it is challenging given the volume and complexity of biomedical data. Here we describe the development of an open source biomedical data discovery system called DataMed, with the goal of promoting the building of additional data indexes in the biomedical domain. MATERIALS AND

methodsDataMed, which can efficiently index and search diverse types of biomedical datasets across repositories, is developed through the National Institutes of Health-funded biomedical and healthCAre Data Discovery Index Ecosystem (bioCADDIE) consortium. It consists of 2 main components: (1) a data ingestion pipeline that collects and transforms original metadata information to a unified metadata model, called DatA Tag Suite (DATS), and (2) a search engine that finds relevant datasets based on user-entered queries. In addition to describing its architecture and techniques, we evaluated individual components within DataMed, including the accuracy of the ingestion pipeline, the prevalence of the DATS model across repositories, and the overall performance of the dataset retrieval engine. RESULTS AND

conclusionOur manual review shows that the ingestion pipeline could achieve an accuracy of 90% and core elements of DATS had varied frequency across repositories. On a manually curated benchmark dataset, the DataMed search engine achieved an inferred average precision of 0.2033 and a precision at 10 (P@10, the number of relevant results in the top 10 search results) of 0.6022, by implementing advanced natural language processing and terminology services. Currently, we have made the DataMed system publically available as an open source package for the biomedical community.

Indexed as

data discovery indexdatasetinformation disseminationinformation storage and retrievalmetadata

Identifiers

PMID29346583
PMCPMC7378878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.