Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29346521›Full record

ReviewAnnals of botany2018

The intracellular and intercellular cross-talk during subsidiary cell formation in Zea mays: existing and novel components orchestrating cell polarization and asymmetric division.

P Apostolakos, P Livanos, E Giannoutsou, E Panteris, B Galatis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of botany, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Tissue-Specific Differential Distribution of Cell Wall Epitopes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. 3,4-Dehydro-L-proline Induces Programmed Cell Death in the Roots ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The Role of GrassFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The botanical multiverse of Peter Barlow.Communicative & integrative biology · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

P ApostolakosDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
P LivanosDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
E GiannoutsouDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
E PanterisDepartment of Botany, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece.
B GalatisDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Formation of stomatal complexes in Poaceae is the outcome of three asymmetric and one symmetric cell division occurring in particular leaf protodermal cells. In this definite sequence of cell division events, the generation of subsidiary cells is of particular importance and constitutes an attractive model for studying local intercellular stimulation. In brief, an induction stimulus emitted by the guard cell mother cells (GMCs) triggers a series of polarization events in their laterally adjacent protodermal cells. This signal determines the fate of the latter cells, forcing them to divide asymmetrically and become committed to subsidiary cell mother cells (SMCs). Scope: This article summarizes old and recent structural and molecular data mostly derived from Zea mays, focusing on the interplay between GMCs and SMCs, and on the unique polarization sequence occurring in both cell types. Recent evidence suggests that auxin operates as an inducer of SMC polarization/asymmetric division. The intercellular auxin transport is facilitated by the distribution of a specific transmembrane auxin carrier and requires reactive oxygen species (ROS). Interestingly, the local differentiation of the common cell wall between SMCs and GMCs is one of the earliest features of SMC polarization. Leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases, Rho-like plant GTPases as well as the SCAR/WAVE regulatory complex also participate in the perception of the morphogenetic stimulus and have been implicated in certain polarization events in SMCs. Moreover, the transduction of the auxin signal and its function are assisted by phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase and the products of the catalytic activity of phospholipases C and D. Conclusion: In the present review, the possible role(s) of each of the components in SMC polarization and asymmetric division are discussed, and an overall perspective on the mechanisms beyond these phenomena is provided.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionCell PolarityPlant ProteinsReceptor Cross-TalkZea maysPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29346521
PMCPMC6215039
OpenAlexW2783141206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.