Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29346368›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Mechanical feedback coordinates cell wall expansion and assembly in yeast mating morphogenesis.

Samhita P Banavar, Carlos Gomez, Michael Trogdon, Linda R Petzold, Tau-Mu Yi, Otger Campàs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Conserved physical mechanisms of cell and tissue elongation.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samhita P BanavarDepartment of Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6405-0574
Carlos GomezCalifornia NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5619-0841
Michael TrogdonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7600-9712
Linda R PetzoldDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6251-6078
Tau-Mu YiDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7208-2020
Otger CampàsCalifornia NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9642-8030
California NanoSystems Institute · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Bridging the Gap Between Molecular and Mechanical Control of Cell MorphogenesisR01GM113241 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI CAMPAS, OTGER · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM113241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shaping of individual cells requires a tight coordination of cell mechanics and growth. However, it is unclear how information about the mechanical state of the wall is relayed to the molecular processes building it, thereby enabling the coordination of cell wall expansion and assembly during morphogenesis. Combining theoretical and experimental approaches, we show that a mechanical feedback coordinating cell wall assembly and expansion is essential to sustain mating projection growth in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Our theoretical results indicate that the mechanical feedback provided by the Cell Wall Integrity pathway, with cell wall stress sensors Wsc1 and Mid2 increasingly activating membrane-localized cell wall synthases Fks1/2 upon faster cell wall expansion, stabilizes mating projection growth without affecting cell shape. Experimental perturbation of the osmotic pressure and cell wall mechanics, as well as compromising the mechanical feedback through genetic deletion of the stress sensors, leads to cellular phenotypes that support the theoretical predictions. Our results indicate that while the existence of mechanical feedback is essential to stabilize mating projection growth, the shape and size of the cell are insensitive to the feedback.

Indexed as

MorphogenesisCell CycleCell MembraneCell ProliferationCell ShapeCell WallExocytosisGenes, Mating Type, FungalGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsMembrane ProteinsModels, TheoreticalPhenotypeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane GlycoproteinsMembrane ProteinsMID2 protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSLG1 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID29346368
PMCPMC5790295
OpenAlexW2783010612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.