Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29346334›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018

Effect of Gastrointestinal Bleeding on Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Yuqian Huang, Rui Zhao, Yaping Cui, Yong Wang, Lin Xia, Yi Chen, Yong Zhou, Xiaoting Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuqian HuangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Rui ZhaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Yaping CuiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Yong WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Lin XiaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Yi ChenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Yong ZhouDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).
Xiaoting WuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The contemporary risk classification criteria of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) may still have room to improve. The aim of our research was to analyze the impact factors for GIST patients' relapse-free survival (RFS). Furthermore, we explore whether gastrointestinal (1) bleeding will be a valuable indicator to predict GIST patients' prognosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS R0 resection GISTs patients were retrospectively enrolled during an 8-year period at West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and all patients' data were from the WCHSU-GIST database. Of a total of 333 GIST patients, 164 patients had GI bleeding. Univariate analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to calculate the survival and recurrence rates. RESULTS Compared with non-GI-bleeding patients, GI-bleeding patients had a shorter relapse-free survival (RFS, P=0.003), but among the different risk groups, GI bleeding only affected the RFS rate of the high-risk group. A Cox regression analysis illustrated that tumor site (P<0.001), tumor size (P=0.009), mitotic index (P<0.001), tumor rupture (P<0.001), and GI-bleeding (P=0.01) were independent indicators for GIST patients' RFS. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that the RFS of GIST patients with GI bleeding was significantly shorter than that of non-GI-bleeding patients, and GI bleeding was an independent negative factor predicting RFS, while GI bleeding had more influence among high-risk patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorChildChild, PreschoolChinaCohort StudiesFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHemorrhageHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID29346334
PMCPMC5784333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.