Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29346139›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2018

Blood biomarkers for evaluation of perinatal encephalopathy: state of the art.

Ernest M Graham, Allen D Everett, Jean-Christophe Delpech, Frances J Northington

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ernest M GrahamDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Allen D EverettNeurosciences Intensive Care Nursery program.
Jean-Christophe DelpechDepartment of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Frances J NorthingtonNeurosciences Intensive Care Nursery program.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USBoston Children's Hospital · USNeurosciences Institute · US

Funding

Imaging Neonatal Hypoxic Ischemic InjuryR01HD074593 · NICHD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI FRANCES J NORTHINGTON, JIANGYANG ZHANG · 2013 to 2026
$6.8M
Novel Biomarkers to Predict Readmission in Pediatric and Adult Heart SurgeryR01HL119664 · NHLBI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BROWN, JEREMIAH R · 2014 to 2017
$3.2M
Adult Biomarkers in Neonatal Brain Injury and DevelopmentR01HD086058 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EVERETT, ALLEN D, NORTHINGTON, FRANCES J · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Clinical and mechanistic role of HDGF in pulmonary hypertensionR01HL135114 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI EVERETT, ALLEN D · 2017 to 2020
$2.9M
Mechanisms of Hypothermic Neuroprotection in NeonatesR01HD070996 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NORTHINGTON, FRANCES J · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL119664NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135114NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD070996NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074593NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe rapid progress in biomarker science is on the threshold of significantly changing clinical care for infants in the neonatal ICU. Infants with neonatal brain injuries will likely be the first group whose management is dramatically altered with point-of-care, rapidly available brain biomarker analysis. Providing an interim update on progress in this area is the purpose of this review. RECENT

findingsHighlighted findings from the past 18 months of publications on biomarkers in neonatal brain injury include; Specific nonbrain markers of cardiac health and global asphyxia continue to provide information on brain injury after hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). Prediction of injury in the piglet hypoxia-ischemia model is improved with the use of a combination score of plasma metabolites. In a neonatal piglet model of perinatal hypoxia-ischemia, a systemic proinflammatory surge of cytokines has been identified after rewarming from therapeutic hypothermia. New biomarkers identified recently include osteopontin, activin A, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, secretoneurin, Tau and neurofilament light protein. Brain-based biomarkers differ in their ability to predict short-term in-hospital outcomes and long-term neurologic deficits. SUMMARY: Neonatal brain biomarker research is currently in its very early development with major advances still to be made.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersBrain InjuriesHumansHypoxia-Ischemia, BrainInfant, NewbornPrognosisSwineBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID29346139
PMCPMC5884146
OpenAlexW2911607717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.