Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29346137›Full record

ArticleJournal for nurses in professional development

Guidance Provided to Authors on Citing and Formatting References in Nursing Journals.

Leslie H Nicoll, Marilyn H Oermann, Peggy L Chinn, Jamie L Conklin, Sathya Amarasekara, Midori McCarty

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for nurses in professional development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Turning Manuscripts into Publications: A Roadmap for Novice Authors.Advances in rehabilitation science and practice
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leslie H NicollLeslie H. Nicoll, PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN, is Editor-in-Chief, CIN: Computers, Informatics Nursing and Nurse Author & Editor, and President and Owner, Maine Desk LLC, Portland. Marilyn H. Oermann, PhD, RN, ANEF, FAAN, is Thelma M. Ingles Professor of Nursing and Director of Evaluation and Educational Research, Duke University School of Nursing, and Editor, Nurse Educator and Journal of Nursing Care Quality, Durham, North Carolina. Peggy L. Chinn, PhD, RN, FAAN, is Editor, Advances in Nursing Science, and Professor Emerita, University of Connecticut School of Nursing, Storrs. Jamie L. Conklin, MSLIS, is Research & Education Librarian and Liaison to the School of Nursing, Duke University Medical Center Library & Archives, Durham, North Carolina. Sathya Amarasekara, MS, is Statistician III, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, North Carolina. Midori McCarty, MA, is Clinical Research Coordinator, Duke Office of Clinical Research, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Marilyn H Oermann
Peggy L Chinn
Jamie L Conklin
Sathya Amarasekara
Midori McCarty

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reference citations should be accurate, complete, and presented in a consistent format. This study analyzed information provided to authors on preparing citations and references for manuscripts submitted to nursing journals (n = 209). Half of the journals used the American Psychological Association reference style. Slightly more than half provided examples of how to cite articles and books; there were fewer examples of citing websites and online journals. Suggestions on improving accuracy of references are discussed.

Indexed as

Bibliographies as TopicPeriodicals as TopicAuthorshipHumansNursing ResearchPublishing

Identifiers

PMID29346137
PMCPMC5841848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.