Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29345395›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2018

Patient, carer and public involvement in major system change in acute stroke services: The construction of value.

Christopher McKevitt, Angus I G Ramsay, Catherine Perry, Simon J Turner, Ruth Boaden, Charles D A Wolfe, Naomi J Fulop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rationalizing the Influence of Co-Design on Distress, Clinical Decision-Making and Disease Self-Management of Cancer Patients-as-Partners: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Implementation of a patient-reported experience measure in a Dutch disability care organization: A process evaluation of cocreated tailored strategies.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  6. Contributors are representative, as long as they agree: How confirmation logic overrides effort to achieve synthesis in applied health research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Mapping the role of patient and public involvement during the different stages of healthcare innovation: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  9. Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI-assisted mental health care: A systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Patient, carer and public involvement in major system change in acute stroke services: The construction of value.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christopher McKevittSchool of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5290-4613
Angus I G RamsayDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.
Catherine PerryAlliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8496-6923
Simon J TurnerCentre for Primary Care, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Ruth BoadenAlliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Charles D A WolfeSchool of Population Health & Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
Naomi J FulopDepartment of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5306-6140

Funding

Department of Health 10/1009/09
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient and public involvement is required where changes to care provided by the UK National Health Service are proposed. Yet involvement is characterized by ambiguity about its rationales, methods and impact.

aimsTo understand how patients and carers were involved in major system changes (MSCs) to the delivery of acute stroke care in 2 English cities, and what kinds of effects involvement was thought to produce.

methodsAnalysis of documents from both MSC projects, and retrospective in-depth interviews with 45 purposively selected individuals (providers, commissioners, third-sector employees) involved in the MSC.

resultsInvolvement was enacted through consultation exercises; lay membership of governance structures; and elicitation of patient perspectives. Interviewees' views of involvement in these MSCs varied, reflecting different views of involvement per se, and of implicit quality criteria. The value of involvement lay not in its contribution to acute service redesign but in its facilitation of the changes developed by professionals. We propose 3 conceptual categories-agitation management, verification and substantiation-to identify types of process through which involvement was seen to facilitate system change. DISCUSSION: Involvement was seen to have strategic and intrinsic value. Its strategic value lay in facilitating the implementation of a model of care that aimed to deliver evidence-based care to all; its intrinsic value was in the idea of citizen participation in change processes as an end in its own right. The concept of value, rather than impact, may provide greater traction in analyses of contemporary involvement practices.

Indexed as

Organizational InnovationCaregiversDelivery of Health CareHealth Services ResearchHumansInterviews as TopicPatient ParticipationRetrospective StudiesStrokeUnited Kingdomimpactinvolvementmajor system changeparticipationstrokevalue

Identifiers

PMID29345395
PMCPMC5980598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.