Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29345329›Full record

ArticleCurrent protocols in cytometry2018

Generating Quantitative Cell Identity Labels with Marker Enrichment Modeling (MEM).

Kirsten E Diggins, Jocelyn S Gandelman, Caroline E Roe, Jonathan M Irish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current protocols in cytometry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Distinct time-dependentFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Two New Neutrophil Subsets Define a Discriminating Sepsis Signature.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2022
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Defining T Cell Subsets in Human Tonsils Using ChipCytometry.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2021
    Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Human Germinal Center B Cells Differ from Naïve and Memory B Cells in CD40 Expression and CD40L-Induced Signaling Response.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2019
    Article
  18. Picturing Polarized Myeloid Phagocytes and Regulatory Cells by Mass Cytometry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kirsten E DigginsDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jocelyn S GandelmanVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Caroline E RoeDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Jonathan M IrishDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
Targeting the B Cell Receptor Signaling Network in LymphomaR00CA143231 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI IRISH, JONATHAN MICHAEL · 2012 to 2014
$715k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS R00 CA143231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiplexed single-cell experimental techniques like mass cytometry measure 40 or more features and enable deep characterization of well-known and novel cell populations. However, traditional data analysis techniques rely extensively on human experts or prior knowledge, and novel machine learning algorithms may generate unexpected population groupings. Marker enrichment modeling (MEM) creates quantitative identity labels based on features enriched in a population relative to a reference. While developed for cell type analysis, MEM labels can be generated for a wide range of multidimensional data types, and MEM works effectively with output from expert analysis and diverse machine learning algorithms. MEM is implemented as an R package and includes three steps: (1) calculation of MEM values that quantify each feature's relative enrichment in the population, (2) reporting of MEM labels as a heatmap or as a text label, and (3) quantification of MEM label similarity between populations. The protocols here show MEM analysis using datasets from immunology and oncology. These MEM implementations provide a way to characterize population identity and novelty in the context of computational and expert analyses. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, TheoreticalAnimalsElectronic Data ProcessingFlow CytometryHumansbioinformaticscell identitycomputational biologycytotypeflow cytometrymachine learningmarker enrichment modelingmass cytometryMEMsingle cell

Identifiers

PMID29345329
PMCPMC5774653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.