Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29344892›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2018

Mechanically Coupled Reaction-Diffusion Model to Predict Glioma Growth: Methodological Details.

David A Hormuth, Stephanie L Eldridge, Jared A Weis, Michael I Miga, Thomas E Yankeelov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Inverse Problem Regularization for 3D Multi-Species Tumor Growth Models.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identifiability and model selection frameworks for models of high-grade glioma response to chemoradiation.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ensemble Inversion for Brain Tumor Growth Models With Mass Effect.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David A HormuthInstitute for Computational and Engineering Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. david.hormuth@austin.utexas.edu.
Stephanie L EldridgeInstitute for Computational and Engineering Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Jared A WeisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Michael I MigaBiomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Thomas E YankeelovInstitute for Computational and Engineering Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. thomas.yankeelov@utexas.edu.

Funding

Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment Research ProgramP30CA068485 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATTHEW J TYSKA · 1995 to 2026
$172.8M
Multimodal Registration of the Brain's Cortical SurfaceR01NS049251 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GOLBY, ALEXANDRA J, MIGA, MICHAEL IAN · 2005 to 2018
$6.7M
Quantitative Multiscale Imaging to Optimize Cancer Treatment StrategiesR01CA186193 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI QUARANTA, VITO, RERICHA, ERIN C · 2014 to 2019
$3.1M
Image Driven Multi-Scale Modeling to Predict Treatment Response in Breast CancerU01CA174706 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI QUARANTA, VITO, YANKEELOV, THOMAS E · 2013 to 2018
$2.5M
Multi-Scale Biomechanical Modeling of Tumor Growth and Response in Breast CancerK25CA204599 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WEIS, JARED ANTHONY · 2016 to 2020
$747k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA204599NCI NIH HHS P30 CA068485NCI NIH HHS R01 CA186193NCI NIH HHS U01 CA174706NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS049251
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biophysical models designed to predict the growth and response of tumors to treatment have the potential to become a valuable tool for clinicians in care of cancer patients. Specifically, individualized tumor forecasts could be used to predict response or resistance early in the course of treatment, thereby providing an opportunity for treatment selection or adaption. This chapter discusses an experimental and modeling framework in which noninvasive imaging data is used to initialize and parameterize a subject-specific model of tumor growth. This modeling approach is applied to an analysis of murine models of glioma growth.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBrainBrain NeoplasmsComputer SimulationFemaleGliomaMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, BiologicalRats, WistarSoftwareBiophysical stressCancerDiffusionFinite difference methodInvasionMRI

Identifiers

PMID29344892
PMCPMC6530463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.