ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2018
The Role of Bone Secreted Factors in Burn-Induced Muscle Cachexia.
Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Protein kinase C-λ drives third-degree burn-induced muscle wasting via STAT3-dependent catabolic pathways.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Plasmin drives burn-induced systemic inflammatory response syndrome.JCI insight · 2021Article
- Erythropoietin Alleviates Burn-induced Muscle Wasting.International journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
- The Role of Calcium in Inflammation-Associated Bone Resorption.Biomolecules · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewBurn injury results in resorptive bone loss, failure to make new bone, and muscle protein breakdown resulting in cachexia. The purpose of this review is to examine the relationship between bone loss and muscle atrophy in burn injury with a view to understanding the process at work and how it may apply to other conditions that have similar features. RECENT
findingsWe present data suggesting that the use of bisphosphonates in the first 10 days following the burn prevents not only the resorptive bone loss but also the muscle wasting. While an extra-osseous effect of bisphosphonates remains possible, existing evidence points to a paracrine effect of bone on maintenance of muscle mass and strength. Proposed paracrine factors produced by bone include prostaglandin E2 and components of the Wnt signaling pathway. TGFβ may be a bone paracrine factor that causes oxidative damage to muscle. In the light of the pattern of evidence, burn patients suffer acute resorptive bone loss and muscle wasting. This is likely due to the effects of inflammatory cytokines and endogenous glucocorticoid production in exacerbating oxidative stress. Early use of bisphosphonates can maintain bone mass leading to a paracrine effect of bone in the maintenance of muscle mass, although one cannot completely discount a direct effect of bisphosphonate on muscle. Because investigators report this relationship in a variety of conditions in addition to burns, physicians should seriously consider the early use of bisphosphonates to maintain bone and muscle mass in a variety of neuromuscular and skeletal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.