ArticleNeuroinformatics2018
Automated 3D Soma Segmentation with Morphological Surface Evolution for Neuron Reconstruction.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain-wide 3D neuron detection and mapping with deep learning.Neurophotonics · 2025Article
- Accurate Neuronal Soma Segmentation Using 3D Multi-Task Learning U-Shaped Fully Convolutional Neural Networks.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2020Article
- Cell numbers, distribution, shape, and regional variation throughout the murine hippocampal formation from the adult brain Allen Reference Atlas.Brain structure & function · 2019Article
- Cocaine-Induced Preference Conditioning: a Machine Vision Perspective.Neuroinformatics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The automatic neuron reconstruction is important since it accelerates the collection of 3D neuron models for the neuronal morphological studies. The majority of the previous neuron reconstruction methods only focused on tracing neuron fibres without considering the somatic surface. Thus, topological errors often present around the soma area in the results obtained by these tracing methods. Segmentation of the soma structures can be embedded in the existing neuron tracing methods to reduce such topological errors. In this paper, we present a novel method to segment the soma structures with complex geometry. It can be applied along with the existing methods in a fully automated pipeline. An approximate bounding block is firstly estimated based on a geodesic distance transform. Then the soma segmentation is obtained by evolving the surface with a set of morphological operators inside the initial bounding region. By evaluating the methods against the challenging images released by the BigNeuron project, we showed that the proposed method can outperform the existing soma segmentation methods regarding the accuracy. We also showed that the soma segmentation can be used for enhancing the results of existing neuron tracing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29344781What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.