Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29344564›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2018

Endoscopic ultrasound guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy in solid pancreatic masses - a prospective validation study.

John Gásdal Karstensen, Tatiana Cârţână, Codruţa Constantinescu, Silviu Dumitrașcu, Bojan Kovacevic, Pia Klausen, Hazem Hassan, Tobias Wirenfeldt Klausen, Helga Bertani, Manoop S Bhutani and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

John Gásdal KarstensenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark.
Tatiana CârţânăResearch Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Codruţa ConstantinescuResearch Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Silviu DumitrașcuResearch Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Craiova, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Craiova, Craiova, Romania.
Bojan KovacevicGastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Pia KlausenGastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Hazem HassanGastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Tobias Wirenfeldt KlausenDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Helga BertaniGastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, NOCSAE Hospital, Modena, Italy.
Manoop S BhutaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Adrian SăftoiuGastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Peter VilmannGastro Unit, Division of Endoscopy, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark.
Gentofte Hospital · DKUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova · RONational Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment · USSlagelse Hospital · DKThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsEndoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is a keystone in diagnosing and staging of pancreatic masses. Recently, a microfiber that can pass through a 19-gauge needle has been introduced for confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE). The aims of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic value and the reproducibility of nCLE criteria for solid malignant lesions. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis prospective dual-center study included patients with pancreatic masses suspicious of malignancy referred for EUS-FNA. Endomicroscopic imaging was performed under EUS-guidance until organ-specific structures were obtained. Afterwards, standard cytology was obtained and patients were followed for up to 12 months. All nCLE parameters included in former studies were correlated with the final diagnosis (dark lobular structures/normal acinar cells, dark cell aggregates > 40 µm, dilated irregular vessels with fluorescein leakage, fine white fibrous bands, small black cell movements, pseudoglandular structures). Finally, three CLE novices and three CLE experts assessed the unedited movies from all patients.

resultsTwenty-eight patients were enrolled in the study. A final diagnosis was obtained in 24 patients (86 %). One patient (3 %) died before a diagnosis was obtained, while 3 were lost to follow-up (11 %). In 18/24 patients (74 %) the diagnosis was malignant. The mean sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the nCLE parameters ranged from 19 - 93 %, 0 - 56 %, 26 - 69 %, respectively. The inter-observer values ranged from κ = 0.20 - 0.41 for novices and κ = -0.02 - 0.38 for experts.

conclusionsThe diagnostic value of nCLE in solid pancreatic masses is questionable and the inter-observer agreement for both novices and CLE experts appears limited.

Identifiers

PMID29344564
PMCPMC5770262
OpenAlexW2783373911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.