ArticleOcular oncology and pathology2017
Optic Nerve Obscuration in Retinoblastoma: A Risk Factor for Optic Nerve Invasion?
Article in Ocular oncology and pathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic performance of MRI of post-laminar optic nerve invasion detection in retinoblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neuroradiology · 2021Pooled it
- High-risk features in retinoblastoma: the association between histopathology and MRI.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Magnetic resonance features in advanced retinoblastoma - what a paediatric radiologist needs to know.Pediatric radiology · 2025Review
- Article
- Long noncoding RNAs as potential biomarkers in retinoblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer cell international · 2020Review
- Clinicopathological Findings of Retinoblastoma: A 10-Year Experience from a Tertiary Hospital in Kampala, Uganda.Journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe objective of this study is to evaluate the risk of optic nerve invasion associated with optic nerve obscuration at diagnosis or persisting during treatment.
methodsRetrospective review from 2011-2016 of patients with advanced retinoblastoma (Group D/E) with complete obscuration of the nerve at diagnosis and a second group of patients with persistent, complete obscuration throughout treatment.
resultsAdvanced retinoblastoma was diagnosed in 102 eyes of 86 patients. The optic nerve was obscured in 69 eyes (68%) at diagnosis. Of these, 30 (43%) underwent salvage therapy and 39 (57%) primary enucleation. Histopathologic analysis of primarily enucleated eyes showed 41% prelaminar and 15% postlaminar invasion. Four eyes in the salvage group demonstrated persistent nerve obscuration; 2 were subsequently enucleated without evidence of nerve invasion. Average follow-up was 23.5 months (range 1-62 months). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Optic nerve obscuration at diagnosis may be associated with postlaminar optic nerve invasion. While persistent, complete obscuration of the optic nerve by retinoblastoma during treatment is a poor prognostic sign for both globe salvage and vision, it does not appear, in this small cohort, to increase the risk of optic nerve invasion. With appropriate control of the intraocular tumor, these eyes can be salvaged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.