Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29344406›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2018

Research protocol: investigating the feasibility of a group self-management intervention for stroke (the GUSTO study).

Ella Clark, Nick S Ward, Gianluca Baio, Fiona Jones

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ella Clark1National Hospital for Neurology and Neuroscience, University College London Hospital, Box 146, 33 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG England.ORCID 0000-0001-7436-1114
Nick S Ward2Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Motor Disorders, University College London, London, England.
Gianluca Baio3Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, England.
Fiona Jones4Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St Georges University of London, London, England.
Royal London Hospital · GBRoyal Statistical Society · GBSobell House · GBSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1013-32101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLife after stroke can be an ongoing struggle with over half of all survivors reporting unmet emotional and social needs. In the United Kingdom's (UK) national clinical guidelines for stroke, self-management is suggested as one approach which can support long-term needs. In the UK NHS, self-management interventions are delivered in various ways. Regardless of the delivery mechanism, a tailored approach and ways to integrate peer support are advocated. Group delivery offers a platform for peer support and has the potential to remain individualised. However, before the efficacy of a group self-management intervention can be tested, the feasibility must be explored. This research investigates the feasibility of a GroUp Self-management intervention for sTrOke (GUSTO).

methodsA randomised waitlist control design will be used to investigate the feasibility of a group self-management intervention adapted from an existing one-to-one intervention called DISCUSSION: There is a growing interest in group-based self-management interventions for stroke as a method of supporting stroke survivors' ongoing unmet needs. This is an area with limited research to date. This study will inform design of a fully powered trial which would assess the efficacy of a group self-management intervention following stroke.

trial registrationISRCTN19867168.

Indexed as

FeasibilityGroup programmesLong-term conditionsRehabilitationSelf-efficacySelf-managementStroke

Identifiers

PMID29344406
PMCPMC5765599
OpenAlexW2782575575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.