Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29344182›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2017

C-reactive protein/albumin and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratios and their combination predict overall survival in patients with gastric cancer.

Minjie Mao, Xiaoli Wei, Hui Sheng, Peidong Chi, Yijun Liu, Xiaoyan Huang, Yifan Xiang, Qianying Zhu, Shan Xing, Wanli Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Minjie MaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P.R. China.
Xiaoli WeiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P.R. China.
Hui ShengDepartment of Experimental Research, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P.R. China.
Peidong ChiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P.R. China.
Yijun LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P.R. China.
Xiaoyan HuangZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510275, P.R. China.
Yifan XiangZhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510275, P.R. China.
Qianying ZhuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P.R. China.
Shan XingDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P.R. China.
Wanli LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple studies have reported the prognostic association of certain inflammatory factors with various types of cancer. The present study assessed the prognostic value of the C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin (Alb) ratio and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), separately and in combination, in gastric cancer (GC). A total of 337 cases pathologically diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma were retrospectively evaluated. The clinicopathological and prognostic relevance of the CRP/Alb ratio and NLR and their combination were analyzed. The optimal cut-off values of the CRP/Alb ratio and NLR were 0.38 and 3.14, respectively. High CRP/Alb ratio (≥0.38) and NLR (≥3.14) values were associated with increased tumor invasion, more distant metastasis and a more advanced tumor-node-metastasis stage (all P<0.05). In addition, a high NLR value was also associated with increased tumor size (P=0.02). The CRP/Alb ratio (≥0.38/<0.38) and NLR (≥3.14/<3.14) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival time (OS) in GC by multivariate analysis (P=0.005 and P=0.001). Using the CRP/Alb ratio and NLR classification, patients were stratified into three subgroups with different OS time (P<0.001), which were identified as independent prognostic variables in multivariate analysis (P<0.001). The present study demonstrated that the CRP/Alb ratio and NLR were independent prognostic factors for OS in patients with GC. The combination of these indexes was associated with significant prognostic value and may further stratify prognosis.

Indexed as

albuminC-reactive proteingastric cancerlymphocyteneutrophilprognosis

Identifiers

PMID29344182
PMCPMC5755031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.