Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29344086›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2018

Correlation of structure, function and protein dynamics in GH7 cellobiohydrolases from

Anna S Borisova, Elena V Eneyskaya, Suvamay Jana, Silke F Badino, Jeppe Kari, Antonella Amore, Magnus Karlsson, Henrik Hansson, Mats Sandgren, Michael E Himmel and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Ega3 from the fungal pathogenThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Anna S Borisova1Department of Molecular Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7015, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Elena V Eneyskaya2B.P. Konstantinov Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute", Orlova Roscha, Gatchina, Leningrad Region 188300 Russia.
Suvamay Jana3Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky, 177 F. Paul Anderson Tower, Lexington, KY 40506-0046 USA.
Silke F Badino4Department of Science and Environment, Roskilde University, 1 Universitetsvej, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Jeppe Kari4Department of Science and Environment, Roskilde University, 1 Universitetsvej, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Antonella AmoreNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, Biosciences Center, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Magnus Karlsson6Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7026, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Henrik Hansson1Department of Molecular Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7015, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Mats Sandgren1Department of Molecular Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7015, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Michael E HimmelNational Renewable Energy Laboratory, Biosciences Center, 15013 Denver West Parkway, Golden, CO 80401 USA.
Peter Westh4Department of Science and Environment, Roskilde University, 1 Universitetsvej, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark.
Christina M Payne3Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Kentucky, 177 F. Paul Anderson Tower, Lexington, KY 40506-0046 USA.
Anna A Kulminskaya2B.P. Konstantinov Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, National Research Centre "Kurchatov Institute", Orlova Roscha, Gatchina, Leningrad Region 188300 Russia.
Jerry Ståhlberg1Department of Molecular Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7015, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4059-8580
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SERoskilde University · DKKurchatov Institute · RUNational Laboratory of the Rockies · USPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University · RUUniversity of Kentucky · USU.S. National Science Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ascomycete fungus

resultsThe

conclusionsWe hypothesize that the combination of loop motifs is the main determinant for the observed differences in Cel7A activity on cellulosic substrates. Fine-tuning of the loop flexibility appears to be an important evolutionary target in

Indexed as

CellobiohydrolaseCellulase engineeringTrichoderma atrovirideTrichoderma harzianumTrichoderma reesei

Identifiers

PMID29344086
PMCPMC5766984
OpenAlexW2783277843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.