ReviewClinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology2018
Hospitalisation in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
Review in Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Myocarditis and coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination: A systematic review and meta-summary of cases.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2023Pooled it
- Sacubitril/valsartan and loop diuretic requirement in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the PARAGON-HF trial.European journal of heart failure · 2023Trial
- Prediction of 90 day readmission in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction by interpretable machine learning.ESC heart failure · 2024Article
- Missed opportunities in the diagnosis of heart failure: a real-world assessment.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Is excessive ventricular irregularity predictive of rehospitalization in patients with permanent AF and HFpEF?ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Thirty-day readmission in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the nationwide readmission database.World journal of cardiology · 2022Article
- Readmissions, Death and Its Associated Predictors in Heart Failure With Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Common Comorbidities that Alter Heart Failure Prognosis - Shaping New Thinking for Practice.Current cardiology reviews · 2021Review
- Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction and 30-Day Readmission.Clinical medicine & research · 2020Article
- The Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Conundrum-Redefining the Problem and Finding Common Ground?Current heart failure reports · 2020Review
- Diagnosis and treatment of heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.World journal of cardiology · 2020Review
- What Next After Metformin? Thinking Beyond Glycaemia: Are SGLT2 Inhibitors the Answer?Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure is highly prevalent with more than 50% of cases being patients with a preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), a figure that is projected to increase due to the changing risk factor landscape, in particular the ageing population. Overall mortality is similar to patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFREF), as are the rates of hospitalisation. Patients with HFPEF have more comorbid conditions with fewer therapeutic options available. In this review, we explore the epidemiology of hospitalisation of HFPEF, the impact of current treatment modalities, and the potential of future therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.