Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29343867›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Improving survival of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients complicated with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.

Jie Gao, Qing Zhang, Yuankui Wu, Ying Li, Tingting Qi, Congyan Zhu, Sijia Liu, Ruoxi Yu, Qinjun He, Weiqun Wen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. [Consensus on diagnosis and treatment of invasive fungal infection in patients with severe liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Distribution ofTherapeutic advances in infectious disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jie GaoHepatology Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qing ZhangPharmacy Department, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuankui WuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ying LiHepatology Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Tingting QiHepatology Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Congyan ZhuHepatology Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Sijia LiuPharmacy Department, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Ruoxi YuDepartment of Medical Imaging, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qinjun HeHepatology Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Weiqun WenHepatology Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Fuyuan ZhouHepatology Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yongpeng ChenHepatology Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinjun ChenHepatology Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. chjj@smu.edu.cn.
Jinlin HouHepatology Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Nanfang Hospital · CNSouthern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mortality of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients complicated with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) was extremely high. We aimed to explore prognostic value of the Chronic Liver Failure-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (CLIF-SOFA) lung score and to establish an optimal voriconazole regimen for ACLF patients complicated with IPA. We retrospectively screened hospitalized ACLF patients in our hospital from July 2011 to April 2016, from which 20 probable IPA cases were diagnosed. Along with onsets of IPA, deteriorated diseases severity, especially lung conditions were found in those 20 ACLF patients. It was found that IPA patients with CLIF-SOFA lung score <2 had better 28-day survival than those with lung score >1 (11/13 vs 0/7, p < 0.001). Based on plasma voriconazole concentration measurement, an optimal voriconazole regimen (loading doses: 0.2 g twice daily; maintenance doses, 0.1 g once daily) was established, which resulted in rational trough plasma drug concentrations (1-5 μg/mL), good clinical outcomes (90-day survival rate of 6/8) and no observed adverse events. In conclusion, CLIF-SOFA lung score >1 was able to identify ACLF patients complicated with IPA encountering much higher 28-day mortality. An optimal voriconazole regimen was safe and effective in our ACLF patients complicated with IPA.

Indexed as

Acute-On-Chronic Liver FailureAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntifungal AgentsBiomarkersFemaleHumansInvasive Pulmonary AspergillosisMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSeverity of Illness IndexSurvival RateTomography, X-Ray ComputedVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsBiomarkersVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID29343867
PMCPMC5772638
OpenAlexW2783932651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.