ArticleScientific reports2018
Development and validation of a brief diabetic foot ulceration risk checklist among diabetic patients: a multicenter longitudinal study in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fertility awareness among Chinese university students: scale development and cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Staged management of infected diabetic foot ulcers: a 300-patient cohort study on prognostic grading, pathogen dynamics, and individualized risk prediction.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Diabetic foot in the context of rheumatic diseases: pathogenesis and treatment approaches.Rheumatology international · 2025Review
- Risk factors and a predictive model of diabetic foot in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes.World journal of diabetes · 2025Article
- Screening tools for diabetic foot ulcers: a narrative review.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2025Review
- Chloroquine inhibits salinomycin-induced autophagy for collaborative anticancer effect in breast cancer.BioImpacts : BI · 2025Article
- Dang-Gui-Si-Ni decoction facilitates wound healing in diabetic foot ulcers by regulating expression of AGEs/RAGE/TGF-β/Smad2/3.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Article
- Diabetic foot ulcers risk prediction in patients with type 2 diabetes using classifier based on associations rule mining.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Physical activity, sleep disorders, and type of work in the prevention of cognitive function decline in patients with hypertension.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Sciatic Nerve Stiffness Using Shear Wave Elastography in Patients with Unilateral Diabetic Foot Ulcers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Foot Ulcers in Diabetic Patients.Journal of diabetes research · 2023Article
- Early detection to prevent foot ulceration among type 2 diabetes mellitus patient: A multi-intervention review.Journal of public health research · 2022Article
- Exploring the barriers of patients with diabetic foot complications in China: a qualitative interview study.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of brief diabetic foot ulceration risk checklist.Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2021Article
- Clinician Assessment Tools for Patients with Diabetic Foot Disease: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Review
- ENA-78 Is a Novel Predictor of Wound Healing in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers.Journal of diabetes research · 2019Article
- The Development and Validation of Quality of Life Scale for Iraqi Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aims to develop and assess and validate a brief diabetic foot ulceration risk checklist among diabetic patients through a longitudinal study. Patients who had diabetes mellitus and had no foot ulceration and severe systematic disorders were recruited from eleven tertiary hospitals in nine provinces or municipalities of China. Internal consistency reliability, construct validity, concurrent validity, item property, and measurement invariance of the tool were assessed. The predictive capability of the tool was validated by the follow-up data using the receiver operating characteristic curve. At baseline, 477 valid cases were collected. Twelve items were remained after initial selection. Cronbach's alpha was 0.56. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model had acceptable goodness-of-fit yet local dependency between two items. Item response theory showed that most items had acceptable discrimination and difficulty parameters. Differential item functioning showed that tool had measurement invariance. 278 were followed up one year after the baseline. Follow-up showed that one-year incidence of ulceration among the patients was 3.6%, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.93). The cut-off point of the tool was 4, when sensitivity and specificity were 0.62 and 0.75 respectively. The checklist has good psychometric properties according to mixed evidences from classical and modern test theory, and has good predictive capability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.