Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29343660›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2019

MR-guided Focused Ultrasound for Uterine Fibroids: A Preliminary Study of Relationship between the Treatment Outcomes and Factors of MR Images Including Elastography.

Shintaro Ichikawa, Utaroh Motosugi, Makiko Omori, Katsuhiro Sano, Yoshie Omiya, Shuji Hirata, Hiroshi Onishi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. MR Imaging in the 21st Century: Technical Innovation over the First Two Decades.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Biomarkers in abnormal uterine bleeding†.Biology of reproduction · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shintaro IchikawaDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi.
Utaroh MotosugiDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi.
Makiko OmoriDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Yamanashi.
Katsuhiro SanoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Saitama International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University.
Yoshie OmiyaDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi.
Shuji HirataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Yamanashi.
Hiroshi OnishiDepartment of Radiology, University of Yamanashi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated the value of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) for the prediction of response to magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) for uterine fibroids. Eleven patients were enrolled. A fractional change of >30% in Symptoms Severity Score (SSS) was defined as a 'substantial symptomatic improvement' at 12 months after treatment. The fractional stiffness value reduction in the patients with a substantial improvement in SSS was significantly higher than that in those without (P = 0.0446).

Indexed as

LeiomyomaUterine NeoplasmsAdultElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemaleHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound AblationHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesmagnetic resonance elastographymagnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasoundstiffnessSymptoms Severity Scoreuterine fibroid

Identifiers

PMID29343660
PMCPMC6326767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.