Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29343497›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open2018

Most medical practices are not parachutes: a citation analysis of practices felt by biomedical authors to be analogous to parachutes.

Michael J Hayes, Victoria Kaestner, Sham Mailankody, Vinay Prasad

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pulmonary Metastasectomy in Colorectal Cancer (PulMiCC) randomized controlled trial: a systematic review of published responses.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cancer drug development: The missing links.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael J HayesAffiliations: Division of Internal Medicine (Hayes); Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology (Kaestner, Prasad), Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore.; Division of Myeloma (Mailankody), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health (Prasad); Center for Health Care Ethics (Prasad), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore.
Victoria KaestnerAffiliations: Division of Internal Medicine (Hayes); Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology (Kaestner, Prasad), Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore.; Division of Myeloma (Mailankody), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health (Prasad); Center for Health Care Ethics (Prasad), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore.
Sham MailankodyAffiliations: Division of Internal Medicine (Hayes); Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology (Kaestner, Prasad), Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore.; Division of Myeloma (Mailankody), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health (Prasad); Center for Health Care Ethics (Prasad), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore.
Vinay PrasadAffiliations: Division of Internal Medicine (Hayes); Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology (Kaestner, Prasad), Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore.; Division of Myeloma (Mailankody), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health (Prasad); Center for Health Care Ethics (Prasad), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Ore.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a 2003 paper in

methodsUsing Google Scholar, we identified all citations to the 2003 paper. We searched for claims that a specific practice was akin to a parachute. For each practice, we identified the desired outcome of the practice, and searched Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov for RCTs that were conducted, ongoing, halted, planned or unpublished.

resultsOf 822 articles citing the original paper, 35 (4.1%) argued that a medical practice was akin to a parachute. Eighteen of the 35 (51%) concerned mortality or live birth, and 17 (49%) concerned a lesser outcome. For 22 practices (63%), we identified 1 or more RCTs: in 6 cases (27%), the trials showed a statistically significant benefit of the practice; in 5 (23%), the trials rejected the practice; in 5 (23%), the trials had mixed results; in 2 (9%), the trials were halted; and in 4 (18%), the trials were ongoing. Effect size was calculated for 5 of the 6 practices for which RCTs gave positive results, and the absolute risk reduction ranged from 11% to 30.8%, corresponding to a number needed to treat of 3-9.

interpretationAlthough there is widespread interest regarding the

Identifiers

PMID29343497
PMCPMC5878948
OpenAlexW2784317499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.