Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29343236›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2018

Barriers to timely diagnosis of interstitial lung disease in the real world: the INTENSITY survey.

Gregory P Cosgrove, Pauline Bianchi, Sherry Danese, David J Lederer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Outcomes ofJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gregory P CosgroveNational Jewish Health, 1400 Jackson Street, Denver, CO, 80206, USA. cosgroveg@njhealth.org.
Pauline BianchiVeracyte, Inc., 6000 Shoreline Court, Suite 300, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Sherry DaneseOutcomes Insights, Inc., 2801 Townsgate Road, Suite 30, Westlake Village, CA, 91331, USA.
David J LedererPulmonary Fibrosis Foundation, 230 E. Ohio Street, Suite 500, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USNational Jewish Health · USVeracyte (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other interstitial lung diseases (ILD) presents significant clinical challenges. To gain insights regarding the diagnostic experience of patients with ILD and to identify potential barriers to a timely and accurate diagnosis, we developed an online questionnaire and conducted a national survey of adults with a self-reported diagnosis of ILD.

methodsA pre-specified total of 600 subjects were recruited to participate in a 40-question online survey. E-mail invitations containing a link to the survey were sent to 16 427 registered members of the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation. Additionally, an open invitation was posted on an online forum for patients and caregivers ( www.inspire.com ). The recruitment and screening period was closed once the pre-defined target number of respondents was reached. Eligible participants were adult U.S. residents with a diagnosis of IPF or a non-IPF ILD.

resultsA total of 600 eligible respondents met the eligibility criteria and completed the survey. Of these, 55% reported ≥ 1 misdiagnosis and 38% reported ≥ 2 misdiagnoses prior to the current diagnosis. The most common misdiagnoses were asthma (13.5%), pneumonia (13.0%), and bronchitis (12.3%). The median time from symptom onset to current diagnosis was 7 months (range, 0-252 months), with 43% of respondents reporting a delay of ≥ 1 year and 19% reporting a delay of ≥ 3 years. Sixty-one percent of respondents underwent at least one invasive diagnostic procedure.

conclusionsWhile a minority of patients with ILD will experience an appropriate and expedient diagnosis, the more typical diagnostic experience for individuals with ILD is characterized by considerable delays, frequent misdiagnosis, exposure to costly and invasive diagnostic procedures, and substantial use of healthcare resources. These findings suggest a need for physician education, development of clinical practice recommendations, and improved diagnostic tools aimed at improving diagnostic accuracy in patients with ILD.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsthmaBronchitisDelayed DiagnosisDiagnostic ErrorsDiagnostic Techniques, Respiratory SystemFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisMaleMiddle AgedPneumoniaDiagnosisIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisInterstitial lung disease

Identifiers

PMID29343236
PMCPMC5773175
OpenAlexW2782589408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.