Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29343217›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Ceratocystis cacaofunesta genome analysis reveals a large expansion of extracellular phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase-C genes (PI-PLC).

Eddy Patricia Lopez Molano, Odalys García Cabrera, Juliana Jose, Leandro Costa do Nascimento, Marcelo Falsarella Carazzolle, Paulo José Pereira Lima Teixeira, Javier Correa Alvarez, Ricardo Augusto Tiburcio, Paulo Massanari Tokimatu Filho, Gustavo Machado Alvares de Lima and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Eddy Patricia Lopez MolanoGenomic and Expression Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Odalys García CabreraGenomic and Expression Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Juliana JoseGenomic and Expression Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Leandro Costa do NascimentoCentro Nacional de Processamento de Alto Desempenho, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Marcelo Falsarella CarazzolleGenomic and Expression Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Paulo José Pereira Lima TeixeiraGenomic and Expression Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Javier Correa AlvarezDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Escuela de Ciencias, Universidad EAFIT, Medellın, Colombia.
Ricardo Augusto TiburcioGenomic and Expression Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Paulo Massanari Tokimatu FilhoGenomic and Expression Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Gustavo Machado Alvares de LimaCentro de Biotecnologia Molecular Estrutural, Instituto de Física de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rafael Victório Carvalho GuidoCentro de Biotecnologia Molecular Estrutural, Instituto de Física de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thamy Lívia Ribeiro CorrêaGenomic and Expression Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil.
Adriana Franco Paes LemeBrazilian Biosciences National Laboratory (LNBio) CNPEM, Campinas, Brazil.
Piotr MieczkowskiHigh-Throughput Sequencing Facility, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Gonçalo Amarante Guimarães PereiraGenomic and Expression Laboratory, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Bioagents, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-970, Brazil. goncalo@unicamp.br.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRBrazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials · BRHigh Throughput Biology (United States) · USUniversidad EAFIT · COUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Center for Computational Engineering and Sciences - FAPESP/Cepid 2013/08293-7Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 142357/2014-6Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2009/18467-7Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2009/50119-9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Ceratocystis genus harbors a large number of phytopathogenic fungi that cause xylem parenchyma degradation and vascular destruction on a broad range of economically important plants. Ceratocystis cacaofunesta is a necrotrophic fungus responsible for lethal wilt disease in cacao. The aim of this work is to analyze the genome of C. cacaofunesta through a comparative approach with genomes of other Sordariomycetes in order to better understand the molecular basis of pathogenicity in the Ceratocystis genus.

resultsWe present an analysis of the C. cacaofunesta genome focusing on secreted proteins that might constitute pathogenicity factors. Comparative genome analyses among five Ceratocystidaceae species and 23 other Sordariomycetes fungi showed a strong reduction in gene content of the Ceratocystis genus. However, some gene families displayed a remarkable expansion, in particular, the Phosphatidylinositol specific phospholipases-C (PI-PLC) family. Also, evolutionary rate calculations suggest that the evolution process of this family was guided by positive selection. Interestingly, among the 82 PI-PLCs genes identified in the C. cacaofunesta genome, 70 genes encoding extracellular PI-PLCs are grouped in eight small scaffolds surrounded by transposon fragments and scars that could be involved in the rapid evolution of the PI-PLC family. Experimental secretome using LC-MS/MS validated 24% (86 proteins) of the total predicted secretome (342 proteins), including four PI-PLCs and other important pathogenicity factors.

conclusionAnalysis of the Ceratocystis cacaofunesta genome provides evidence that PI-PLCs may play a role in pathogenicity. Subsequent functional studies will be aimed at evaluating this hypothesis. The observed genetic arsenals, together with the analysis of the PI-PLC family shown in this work, reveal significant differences in the Ceratocystis genome compared to the classical vascular fungi, Verticillium and Fusarium. Altogether, our analyses provide new insights into the evolution and the molecular basis of plant pathogenicity.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantGenome, FungalAscomycotaCacaoEvolution, MolecularFungal ProteinsGenomicsPhosphatidylinositolsPhosphoinositide Phospholipase CPhylogenyProtein ConformationFungal ProteinsPhosphatidylinositolsPhosphoinositide Phospholipase CCeratocystis wilt of cacaoPhosphoinositide-specific phospholipases C (PI PLC)Plant pathogen

Identifiers

PMID29343217
PMCPMC5773145
OpenAlexW2783856903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.