ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2018
Predictors of intracranial hemorrhage volume and distribution in brain arteriovenous malformation.
Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reporting of angiographic studies in patients diagnosed with a cerebral arteriovenous malformation: a systematic review.F1000Research · 2023Pooled it
- Correlation between arteriovenous malformation nidus size and intraparenchymal hematoma volume in the event of rupture.Brain & spine · 2022Article
- Intracranial Gorgon: Surgical Case Report of a Large Calcified Brain Arteriovenous Malformation.The American journal of case reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background and purpose Despite evidence regarding risk factors for brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM)-associated spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), few data exist describing the spectrum of clinical outcomes that bAVM-associated ICH may manifest. This study aimed to identify the demographical, clinical, and bAVM anatomical variables associated with ICH volume and the presence of intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) of ruptured bAVMs, two indicators of worse clinical outcome, to help better predict outcome for unruptured bAVMs. Methods Computed tomography images ( n = 169) of patients with ruptured bAVM in a prospectively maintained institutional database were retrospectively reviewed to calculate ICH volume and the presence or absence of IVH. Demographic, clinical, and bAVM characteristics information was summarized and analyzed with univariable and multivariable regression models to identify the associations of these features with ICH volume and the presence of IVH. Results Patient sex, exclusively deep venous drainage, and lobar location were associated with ICH volume in univariable analysis; exclusively deep venous drainage remained significant in multivariable analysis (PI = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.21-0.52, p < 0.001). Exclusively deep venous drainage, multiple feeding arteries, and venous stenosis were associated with IVH in univariable analysis; exclusively deep venous drainage (OR = 7.27, 95% CI: 1.94-27.29, p = 0.003) remained significant in multivariable analysis. Conclusions Variables associated with ICH volume and the presence of IVH in ruptured bAVMs were evaluated and identified. They impart information that may help predict the clinical outcome of unruptured bAVM, in turn aiding clinicians in treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.