Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29342976›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2018

A Child's Concept of Pain: An International Survey of Pediatric Pain Experts.

Joshua W Pate, Julia M Hush, Mark J Hancock, G Lorimer Moseley, David S Butler, Laura E Simons, Verity Pacey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Talking to Teens about Pain: A Modified Delphi Study of Adolescent Pain Science Education.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joshua W PateFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. joshua.pate@mq.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-1049-3916
Julia M HushFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. julia.hush@mq.edu.au.
Mark J HancockFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. mark.hancock@mq.edu.au.
G Lorimer MoseleySansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. Lorimer.Moseley@unisa.edu.au.
David S ButlerSansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia. david@noigroup.com.
Laura E SimonsStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. lesimons@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3395-9483
Verity PaceyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. verity.pacey@mq.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A child's 'concept of pain' refers to how they understand what pain actually is, what function pain serves, and what biological processes are thought to underpin it. We aimed to determine pediatric pain experts' opinions of: (1) the importance and usefulness of assessing a child's concept of pain in clinical and/or research settings; (2) the usefulness of the content of items within currently published adult-targeted resources for assessing a child's concept of pain; and (3) important domains of a child's concept of pain to assess. Forty-nine pediatric pain experts (response rate = 75.4%) completed an online survey. Descriptive statistics and frequency of responses were analyzed. Experts from all included disciplines reported that assessing a child's concept of pain is important and useful both clinically and in a research setting (>80% reported very or extremely useful for each item). Experts considered that the content of 13 items from currently published adult-targeted resources was useful, but the wording was too complex for children aged 8-12 years. Experts considered that all seven of the proposed domains of a child's concept of pain was important to assess. The findings can be used to inform the development of an assessment tool for a child's concept of pain.

Indexed as

assessmentchildrenconcept of painexpert surveypain

Identifiers

PMID29342976
PMCPMC5789294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.