Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29342896›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

How Does Counselling in a Stationary Health Care Setting Affect the Attendance in a Standardised Sports Club Programme? Process Evaluation of a Quasi-Experimental Study.

Sylvia Titze, Christian Lackinger, Lena Grossschaedl, Albert Strehn, Thomas E Dorner, Josef Niebauer, Wolfgang Schebesch-Ruf

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sylvia TitzeInstitute of Sport Science, University of Graz, Mozartgasse 14, 8010 Graz, Austria. sylvia.titze@uni-graz.at.ORCID 0000-0001-6125-7182
Christian LackingerDepartment of Health Promotion and Prevention, SPORTUNION Österreich, Falkestrasse 1, 1010 Vienna, Austria. c.lackinger@sportunion.at.
Lena GrossschaedlSocial Insurance Authority for Business, Regional Office Styria, Körblergasse 115, 8010 Graz, Austria. lena.grossschaedl@svagw.at.
Albert StrehnCompetence Center Health Promotion, Social Insurance Authority for Business, Osterwiese 2, 7000 Eisenstadt, Austria. albert.strehn@svagw.at.
Thomas E DornerDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, Centre for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15/1, 1090 Vienna, Austria. thomas.dorner@meduniwien.ac.at.
Josef NiebauerInstitute of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation and Research Institute of Molecular Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Lindhofstrasse 20, 5020 Salzburg, Austria. j.niebauer@salk.at.
Wolfgang Schebesch-RufInstitute of Sport Science, University of Graz, Mozartgasse 14, 8010 Graz, Austria. wolfgang.ruf@uni-graz.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Actions in partnership across sectors is one principle for the promotion of health behaviours. The objective of this study was to describe the participation in a sports club-based exercise programme-named JACKPOT-following an intervention in a health care setting. Focus was given to the recruitment into JACKPOT, the attendance level, and whether the different programme elements were implemented as intented. The practicability of the project was also retrospectively rated. Participants were 238 inactive people (50% women) between 30 and 65 years of age who attended a health resort. Of these, 77% were assigned to the intervention group (IG). The recruitment into the 12 JACKPOT sessions and the attendance levels were recorded via attendance lists. The implementation of the intervention standards was assessed with structured interviews and participatory observation. The Pragmatic Explanatory Continuum Indicator Summary (PRECIS)-2 tool served to rate the practicability of the project. Almost 50% of the IG subjects attended JACKPOT sessions at least once and 54% of the attenders visited ≥75% of the 12 sessions. Some of the programme elements were not delivered fully. The process evaluation results showed that the project worked in a real-world setting, and also uncovered potential reasons such as incomplete information delivery for the moderate recruitment and attendance level.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth BehaviorHealth ResortsSportsAdultCounselingDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram Evaluationadultsattendancehealth care settingPRECIS-2sports club

Identifiers

PMID29342896
PMCPMC5800233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.