ArticleThe Behavioral and brain sciences2017
Perceiving numerosity from birth.
Article in The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- What makes different number-space mappings interact?Psychological research · 2024Article
- From vision to cognition: potential contributions of cerebral visual impairment to neurodevelopmental disorders.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2023Review
- Perception of geometric sequences and numerosity both predict formal geometric competence in primary school children.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- A left visual advantage for quantity processing in neonates.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2020Article
- Excessive visual crowding effects in developmental dyscalculia.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Article
- Asymmetrical interference between number and item size perception provides evidence for a domain specific impairment in dyscalculia.PloS one · 2018Article
- On the Difference Between Numerosity Processing and Number Processing.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leibovich et al. opened up an important discussion on the nature and origins of numerosity perception. The authors rightly point out that non-numerical features of stimuli influence this ability. Despite these biases, there is evidence that from birth, humans perceive and represent numerosities, and not just non-numerical quantitative features such as item size, density, and convex hull.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29342652What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.