ArticleThe Behavioral and brain sciences2017
Toward an integrative approach to numerical cognition.
Article in The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Are three zebras more than three frogs: examining conceptual and physical congruency in numerosity judgements of familiar objects.Psychological research · 2024Article
- Disparate processing of numerosity and associated continuous magnitudes in rats.Science advances · 2024Article
- The role of spatial information in an approximate cross-modal number matching task.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- A connectome-based neuromarker of nonverbal number acuity and arithmetic skills.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Steps towards a computational ethology: an automatized, interactive setup to investigate filial imprinting and biological predispositions.Biological cybernetics · 2021Review
- Magnitude integration in the Archerfish.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Giraffes go for more: a quantity discrimination study in giraffes (Giraffa camelopardalis).Animal cognition · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In response to the commentaries, we have refined our suggested model and discussed ways in which the model could be further expanded. In this context, we have elaborated on the role of specific continuous magnitudes. We have also found it important to devote a section to evidence considered the "smoking gun" of the approximate number system theory, including cross-modal studies, animal studies, and so forth. Lastly, we suggested some ways in which the scientific community can promote more transparent and collaborative research by using an open science approach, sharing both raw data and stimuli. We thank the contributors for their enlightening comments and look forward to future developments in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.