Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29342219›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

The expression profile and prognostic significance of eukaryotic translation elongation factors in different cancers.

Md Khurshidul Hassan, Dinesh Kumar, Monali Naik, Manjusha Dixit

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Whole transcriptome analysis identifiesCancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Prognostic biomarkers based onTranslational cancer research · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. DNA methylation profiling identifies epigenetic signatures of early gastric cancer.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Md Khurshidul HassanSchool of Biological Sciences, National Institute of Science Education and Research, HBNI, Bhimpur- Padanpur, Jatni, Khurda, Odisha, India.
Dinesh KumarSchool of Biological Sciences, National Institute of Science Education and Research, HBNI, Bhimpur- Padanpur, Jatni, Khurda, Odisha, India.
Monali NaikSchool of Biological Sciences, National Institute of Science Education and Research, HBNI, Bhimpur- Padanpur, Jatni, Khurda, Odisha, India.
Manjusha DixitSchool of Biological Sciences, National Institute of Science Education and Research, HBNI, Bhimpur- Padanpur, Jatni, Khurda, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6997-1054
National Institute of Science Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic translation factors, especially initiation factors have garnered much attention with regards to their role in the onset and progression of different cancers. However, the expression levels and prognostic significance of translation elongation factors remain poorly explored in different cancers. In this study, we have investigated the mRNA transcript levels of seven translation elongation factors in different cancer types using Oncomine and TCGA databases. Furthermore, we have identified the prognostic significance of these factors using Kaplan-Meier Plotter and SurvExpress databases. We observed altered expression levels of all the elongation factors in different cancers. Higher expression of EEF1A2, EEF1B2, EEF1G, EEF1D, EEF1E1 and EEF2 was observed in most of the cancer types, whereas reverse trend was observed for EEF1A1. Overexpression of many factors predicted poor prognosis in breast (EEF1D, EEF1E1, EEF2) and lung cancer (EEF1A2, EEF1B2, EEF1G, EEF1E1). However, we didn't see any common correlation of expression levels of elongation factors with survival outcomes across cancer types. Cancer subtype stratification showed association of survival outcomes and expression levels of elongation factors in specific sub-types of breast, lung and gastric cancer. Most interestingly, we observed a reciprocal relationship between the expression levels of the two EEF1A isoforms viz. EEF1A1 and EEF1A2, in most of the cancer types. Our results suggest that translation elongation factors can have a role in tumorigenesis and affect survival in cancer specific manner. Elongation factors have potential to serve as biomarkers and therapeutic drug targets, yet further study is required. Reciprocal relationship of differential expression between EEF1A isoforms observed in multiple cancer types indicates opposing roles in cancer and needs further investigation.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticDatabases, Nucleic AcidHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateNeoplasmsPeptide Chain Elongation, TranslationalPeptide Elongation Factor 1PrognosisProtein BiosynthesisProtein IsoformsTranscriptomeEEF1A1 protein, humanEEF1A2 protein, humanEEF1D protein, humanPeptide Elongation Factor 1Protein Isoforms

Identifiers

PMID29342219
PMCPMC5771626
OpenAlexW2782845095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.