Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29342162›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Comparison of diagnostic methods to detect Histoplasma capsulatum in serum and blood samples from AIDS patients.

Katia Cristina Dantas, Roseli Santos de Freitas, Marcos Vinicius da Silva, Paulo Ricardo Criado, Olinda do Carmo Luiz, Adriana Pardini Vicentini

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Usefulness of Serum as a Non-Invasive Sample for the Detection ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Closing the Gap in Proteomic Identification ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Diagnosis of Pulmonary Infections Due to Endemic Fungi.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The global epidemiology of emergingStudies in mycology · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katia Cristina DantasDepartment of Pathology, Sao Paulo University Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1346-9003
Roseli Santos de FreitasMedical Mycology Laboratory-LIM 53/HCFMUSP and Institute of Tropical Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Marcos Vinicius da SilvaEmilio Ribas Institute of Infectious Diseases, Consultant, Ministry of Health, Department of Medicine, Catholic University of Sao Paulo, and Professor, Program in Postgraduate Sciences and Coordination of Disease Control, Department of State Health, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo Ricardo CriadoMedical Mycology Laboratory-LIM 53/HCFMUSP and Institute of Tropical Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Olinda do Carmo LuizPreventive Medicine Department, Sao Paulo University Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Adriana Pardini VicentiniImmunology Center, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRInstituto Adolfo Lutz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough early and rapid detection of histoplasmosis is essential to prevent morbidity and mortality, few diagnostic tools are available in resource-limited areas, especially where it is endemic and HIV/AIDS is also epidemic. Thus, we compared conventional and molecular methods to detect Histoplasma capsulatum in sera and blood from HIV/AIDS patients. METHODOLOGY: We collected a total of 40 samples from control volunteers and patients suspected of histoplasmosis, some of whom were also infected with other pathogens. Samples were then analyzed by mycological, serological, and molecular methods, and stratified as histoplasmostic with (group I) or without AIDS (group II), uninfected (group III), and infected with HIV and other pathogens only (group IV). All patients were receiving treatment for histoplasmosis and other infections at the time of sample collection.

resultsComparison of conventional methods with nested PCR using primers against H. capsulatum 18S rRNA (HC18S), 5.8S rRNA ITS (HC5.8S-ITS), and a 100 kDa protein (HC100) revealed that sensitivity against sera was highest for PCR with HC5.8S-ITS, followed by immunoblotting, double immunodiffusion, PCR with HC18S, and PCR with HC100. Specificity was equally high for double immunodiffusion, immunoblotting and PCR with HC100, followed for PCR with HC18S and HC5.8-ITS. Against blood, sensitivity was highest for PCR with HC5.8S-ITS, followed by PCR with HC18S, Giemsa staining, and PCR with HC100. Specificity was highest for Giemsa staining and PCR with HC100, followed by PCR with HC18S and HC5.8S-ITS. PCR was less efficient in patients with immunodeficiency due to HIV/AIDS and/or related diseases.

conclusionMolecular techniques may detect histoplasmosis even in cases with negative serology and mycology, potentially enabling early diagnosis.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHistoplasmaHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID29342162
PMCPMC5771560
OpenAlexW2788673313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.