Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29342111›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2018

Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Turmeric Extract Incorporated Oil-in-Water Nanoemulsion.

Hee Jeong Yoon, Xiaowei Zhang, Min Gyeong Kang, Gyeong Jin Kim, Sun Young Shin, Sang Hong Baek, Bom Nae Lee, Su Jung Hong, Jun Tae Kim, Kwonho Hong and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Plant Based Extract Oil-Based Nano emulsions: Impact on Human Melanoma Cell Line.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Ultrasonic Nanoemulsification ofInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nano/Micro-Assisted Regenerative Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hee Jeong YoonCollege of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Department of Bioindustrial Technologies, Konkuk University, Hwayang-dong, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Korea. rose_0013@naver.com.
Xiaowei ZhangCollege of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Department of Bioindustrial Technologies, Konkuk University, Hwayang-dong, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Korea. zhangxiaowei9304@gmail.com.
Min Gyeong KangCollege of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Department of Bioindustrial Technologies, Konkuk University, Hwayang-dong, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Korea. vq1004pv@naver.com.
Gyeong Jin KimCollege of Animal Bioscience and Technology, Department of Bioindustrial Technologies, Konkuk University, Hwayang-dong, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Korea. kkg0118@gmail.com.
Sun Young ShinLaboratory of Cardiovascular Regeneration, Division of Cardiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea. tempast606@naver.com.
Sang Hong BaekLaboratory of Cardiovascular Regeneration, Division of Cardiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine, Seoul 02841, Korea. whitesh@catholic.ac.kr.
Bom Nae LeeDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Korea. bomnae1110@gmail.com.
Su Jung HongDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Korea. tnwjd0799@naver.com.
Jun Tae KimDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Korea. jtkim92@kmu.ac.kr.
Kwonho HongKU Convergence Science and Technology Institute, Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Hwayang-dong, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Korea. hongkh27@gmail.com.
Hojae BaeKU Convergence Science and Technology Institute, Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biotechnology, Konkuk University, Hwayang-dong, Kwangjin-gu, Seoul 05029, Korea. hojaebae@konkuk.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To overcome the drawbacks of conventional drug delivery system, nanoemulsion have been developed as an advanced form for improving the delivery of active ingredients. However, safety evaluation is crucial during the development stage before the commercialization. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity of two types of newly developed nanoemulsions. Turmeric extract-loaded nanoemulsion powder-10.6 (TE-NEP-10.6, high content of artificial surfactant Tween 80), which forms the optimal nanoemulsion, and the TE-NEP-8.6 made by increasing the content of natural emulsifier (lecithin) to reduce the potential toxicity of nanoemulsion were cultured with various cells (NIH3T3, H9C2, HepG2, hCPC, and hEPC) and the changes of each cell were observed followed by nanoemulsion treatment. As a result, the two nanoemulsions (TE-NEP-10.6 and TE-NEP-8.6) did not show significant difference in cell viability. In the case of cell line (NIH3T3, H9C2, and HepG2), toxicity was not observed at an experimental concentration of less than 1 mg/mL, however, the cell survival rate decreased in a concentration dependent manner in the case of primary cultured cells. These results from our study can be used as a basic data to confirm the cell type dependent toxicity of nanoemulsion.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCell SurvivalCurcumaDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Delivery SystemsEmulsionsHumansNanoparticlesOilsPlant ExtractsWaterEmulsionsOilsPlant Extractsturmeric extractWatercurcumincytotoxicitynanoemulsionturmeric

Identifiers

PMID29342111
PMCPMC5796226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.