How reliable are commercially available trackers in detecting daytime sleep.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Daytime Sleep-Tracking Performance of Four Commercial Wearable Devices During Unrestricted Home Sleep.Nature and science of sleep · 2023
   Article
2. Towards remote monitoring in pediatric care and clinical trials-Tolerability, repeatability and reference values of candidate digital endpoints derived from physical activity, heart rate and sleep in healthy children.PloS one · 2021
   Article
3. Wearable Sleep Technology in Clinical and Research Settings.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2019
   Review
4. How reliable are commercially available trackers in detecting daytime sleep.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as