ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2018
Internal Medicine Residents' Attitudes Toward Simulated Depressed Cardiac Patients During an Objective Structured Clinical Examination: A Randomized Study.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Role of Bias in Clinical Decision-Making of People with Serious Mental Illness and Medical Co-morbidities: a Scoping Review.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2023Article
- Measuring Primary Health Care Clinicians' Skills for Depression Management.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysician biases toward mental conditions such as depression have been shown to adversely affect medical outcomes.
objectiveTo explore the relationship between residents' explicit bias toward depressed patients and their clinical skills on a cardiac case during an objective structured clinical exam (OSCE).
designProspective parallel randomized controlled study.
participantsOne hundred eighty-five internal medicine residents from three residency programs in two states.
interventionDuring October-November 2015, residents were randomized to either a depressed or non-depressed standardized patient (SP) presenting with acute chest pain. MAIN MEASURES: The Medical Condition Regard Scale (MCRS) assessed residents' explicit bias toward patients with depression. Their clinical skills (history-taking, physical examination, patient counseling, patient-physician interaction (PPI), differential diagnosis, and workup plan) and facial expressions were rated during an OSCE. KEY
resultsNo significant relationships were found between resident explicit bias and clinical skill measurements. Residents who examined the depressed SP scored lower, on average, on history-taking (t [183] = -2.77, p < 0.01, Cohen's d = 0.41) and higher on PPI (t [183] = 2.24, p < 0.05, Cohen's d = 0.33) than residents examining the non-depressed SP. There were no differences, on average, between stations on physical examination, counseling, correct diagnosis, workup plan, or overall SP satisfaction. Facial recognition software demonstrated that residents with a non-depressed SP had more neutral expressions than depressed-SP residents (t [133] = -2.46, p < 0.05, Cohen's d = 0.46), and residents with a depressed SP had more disgusted expressions than non-depressed-SP residents (t [83.52] = 2.10, p < 0.05, Cohen's d = 0.28).
conclusionsExtrinsic bias did not predict OSCE performance in this study. Some differences were noted in the OSCE performance between the two stations. Further study is needed to examine the effects of patient mental health conditions on physician examination procedures, diagnostic behaviors, and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.