Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29340851›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2018

Comparison of antibiotic dosing recommendations for neonatal sepsis from established reference sources.

T B Y Liem, E M A Slob, J U M Termote, T F W Wolfs, A C G Egberts, C M A Rademaker

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. [Clinical practice guidelines for meropenem therapy in neonatal sepsis (2024)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T B Y LiemDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. y.liem@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8177-4136
E M A SlobDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J U M TermoteDepartment of Neonatology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
T F W WolfsDepartment of Pediatrics, Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A C G EgbertsDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1758-7779
C M A RademakerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, 3584 EA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wilhelmina Children's Hospital · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Incorrect dosing is the most frequent prescribing error in neonatology, with antibiotics being the most frequently prescribed medicines. Computer physician order entry and clinical decision support systems can create consistency contributing to a reduction of medication errors. Although evidence-based dosing recommendations should be included in such systems, the evidence is not always available and subsequently, dosing recommendations mentioned in guidelines and textbooks are often based on expert opinion. Objective To compare dosage recommendations for antibiotics in neonates with sepsis provided by eight commonly used and well-established international reference sources. Setting An expert team from our Dutch tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit selected eight well-established international reference sources. Method Daily doses of the seven most frequently used antibiotics in the treatment of neonatal sepsis, classified by categories for birth weight and gestational age, were identified from eight well-respected reference sources in neonatology/pediatric infectious diseases. Main outcome measure Standardized average daily dosage. Results A substantial variation in dosage recommendations of antibiotics for neonatal sepsis between the reference sources was shown. Dosage recommendations of ampicillin, ceftazidime, meropenem and vancomycin varied more than recommendations for benzylpenicillin, cefotaxime and gentamicin. One reference source showed a larger variation in dosage recommendations in comparison to the average recommended daily dosage, compared to the other reference sources. Conclusion Antibiotic dosage recommendations for neonates with sepsis can be derived from important reference sources and guidelines. Further exploration to overcome variation in dosage recommendations is necessary to obtain standardized dosage regimens.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDrug Administration ScheduleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMedical Order Entry SystemsMedication ErrorsNeonatal SepsisNetherlandsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticsDosing recommendationsDosing variationNeonatal sepsisNeonates

Identifiers

PMID29340851
PMCPMC5918525
OpenAlexW2783309343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.