Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29340829›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

Trends and surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy.

William C Kethman, Alex H S Harris, Mary T Hawn, James K Wall

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Anaesthesia for pyloromyotomy.BJA education · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William C KethmanDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, H3591, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA. wkethman@stanford.edu.
Alex H S HarrisDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, H3591, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Mary T HawnDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, H3591, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
James K WallDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

HSRD VA RCS 14-232
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is one of the most common pediatric illnesses necessitating surgical intervention. Controversy remains over the optimal surgical approach between laparoscopic pyloromyotomy (LP) and open pyloromyotomy (OP). LP has gained acceptance for management of HPS in an era of expanding minimal access surgical approaches to pediatric conditions. Several studies suggest advantages of LP over OP; however, selection bias and small sample sizes remain a concern. This study compares the outcomes of LP versus OP using propensity score methods.

methodsThe 2013-2015 ACS NSQIP Pediatric PUF was queried for all infants undergoing pyloromyotomy. The trend in the proportion of infants undergoing LP was described and perioperative outcomes between the OP and LP cohorts were compared using propensity score weighted regression models.

results4847 infants were identified to have undergone surgical pyloromyotomy. The proportion of LP performed increased significantly from 59% in 2013 to 65.5% in 2015 (p < 0.001). LP was associated with lower overall complications (1.4% vs 2.9%) (OR

conclusionsOur study demonstrates that LP is increasingly utilized for management of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis and is associated with shorter length of stay, and lower odds of surgical site-specific and overall complications without differences in related re-operations. This study supports LP as a safe and effective method for management of HPS.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansInfantLaparoscopyMalePostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScorePyloric Stenosis, HypertrophicPyloromyotomyPylorusReoperationMinimally invasive surgeryNSQIPPyloric stenosisPyloromyotomy

Identifiers

PMID29340829
PMCPMC6383511
OpenAlexW2784154164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.