ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018
The development and validation of a scoring tool to predict the operative duration of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reporting and data systems for laparoscopic cholecystectomy with findings of a user adoption survey.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Low‑dose indocyanine green fluorescence cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: visualization performance across validated risk scores.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Machine learning algorithms as early diagnostic tools for prolonged operative time in patients with fluorescent laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Defining Critical View of Safety During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: The Preoperative Predictors of Failure.Cureus · 2023Article
- Acute Cholecystitis from Biliary Lithiasis: Diagnosis, Management and Treatment.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Need for Standardizing Diagnosis, Treatment and Clinical Care of Cholecystitis and Biliary Colic in Gallbladder Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Utility of Tokyo Guidelines 2018 in early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for mild and moderate acute calculus cholecystitis: A retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
- Utility of Tokyo guidelines and intraoperative safety steps in improving the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in complex acute calculus cholecystitis: a prospective study.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Observational
- The critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Strasberg Yes or No? An Italian Multicentre study.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Article
- Reshaping the critical role of surgeons in oncology research.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019Review
- Open conversion for laparoscopically difficult cholecystectomy is still a valid solution with unsolved aspects.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2019Article
- Intra-operative gallbladder scoring predicts conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy: a WSES prospective collaborative study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe ability to accurately predict operative duration has the potential to optimise theatre efficiency and utilisation, thus reducing costs and increasing staff and patient satisfaction. With laparoscopic cholecystectomy being one of the most commonly performed procedures worldwide, a tool to predict operative duration could be extremely beneficial to healthcare organisations.
methodsData collected from the CholeS study on patients undergoing cholecystectomy in UK and Irish hospitals between 04/2014 and 05/2014 were used to study operative duration. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was produced in order to identify significant independent predictors of long (> 90 min) operations. The resulting model was converted to a risk score, which was subsequently validated on second cohort of patients using ROC curves.
resultsAfter exclusions, data were available for 7227 patients in the derivation (CholeS) cohort. The median operative duration was 60 min (interquartile range 45-85), with 17.7% of operations lasting longer than 90 min. Ten factors were found to be significant independent predictors of operative durations > 90 min, including ASA, age, previous surgical admissions, BMI, gallbladder wall thickness and CBD diameter. A risk score was then produced from these factors, and applied to a cohort of 2405 patients from a tertiary centre for external validation. This returned an area under the ROC curve of 0.708 (SE = 0.013, p < 0.001), with the proportions of operations lasting > 90 min increasing more than eightfold from 5.1 to 41.8% in the extremes of the score.
conclusionThe scoring tool produced in this study was found to be significantly predictive of long operative durations on validation in an external cohort. As such, the tool may have the potential to enable organisations to better organise theatre lists and deliver greater efficiencies in care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.