Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29340820›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

The development and validation of a scoring tool to predict the operative duration of elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Reshma Bharamgoudar, Aniket Sonsale, James Hodson, Ewen Griffiths, CholeS Study Group, West Midlands Research Collaborative

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Reshaping the critical role of surgeons in oncology research.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reshma BharamgoudarCollege of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Aniket SonsaleCollege of Medical & Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
James HodsonInstitute of Translational Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Ewen GriffithsInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. ewen.griffiths@uhb.nhs.uk.
CholeS Study Group, West Midlands Research Collaborative

Funding

Department of Health CS-2017-17-010Medical Research Council G0800800
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability to accurately predict operative duration has the potential to optimise theatre efficiency and utilisation, thus reducing costs and increasing staff and patient satisfaction. With laparoscopic cholecystectomy being one of the most commonly performed procedures worldwide, a tool to predict operative duration could be extremely beneficial to healthcare organisations.

methodsData collected from the CholeS study on patients undergoing cholecystectomy in UK and Irish hospitals between 04/2014 and 05/2014 were used to study operative duration. A multivariable binary logistic regression model was produced in order to identify significant independent predictors of long (> 90 min) operations. The resulting model was converted to a risk score, which was subsequently validated on second cohort of patients using ROC curves.

resultsAfter exclusions, data were available for 7227 patients in the derivation (CholeS) cohort. The median operative duration was 60 min (interquartile range 45-85), with 17.7% of operations lasting longer than 90 min. Ten factors were found to be significant independent predictors of operative durations > 90 min, including ASA, age, previous surgical admissions, BMI, gallbladder wall thickness and CBD diameter. A risk score was then produced from these factors, and applied to a cohort of 2405 patients from a tertiary centre for external validation. This returned an area under the ROC curve of 0.708 (SE = 0.013, p < 0.001), with the proportions of operations lasting > 90 min increasing more than eightfold from 5.1 to 41.8% in the extremes of the score.

conclusionThe scoring tool produced in this study was found to be significantly predictive of long operative durations on validation in an external cohort. As such, the tool may have the potential to enable organisations to better organise theatre lists and deliver greater efficiencies in care.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreAdultAgedCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicElective Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeROC CurveLaparoscopic cholecystectomyOperative durationPatient factorsPredictionScoring toolTheatre utilisation

Identifiers

PMID29340820
PMCPMC5988776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.