Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29340809›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2018

Randomized controlled study of intraincisional infiltration versus intraperitoneal instillation of standardized dose of ropivacaine 0.2% in post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain: Do we really need high doses of local anesthetics-time to rethink!

Singh Mathuria Kaushal-Deep, Afzal Anees, Shehtaj Khan, Mohammad Amanullah Khan, Mehershree Lodhi

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03708874 completednot on this map

Comparison of Intravenous Paracetamol and Intraperitoneal Bupivacaine for Acute Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Pain Relief in Patients With Acute Cholecystitis. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training HospitalRan2018 to 2019Enrolled2ConditionsAbdominal Pain, Shoulder Pain, Satisfaction, Complication
NCT06632184 phase4active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Multimodal Management With Peritoneal Lavage Using Saline Solution Versus Saline Solution With Ondansetron in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsPostoperative Pain Management, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Ondansetron, Postoperative Nausea and VomitingArmsOndansetron Intraperitoneal Lavage, Saline Intraperitoneal Lavage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Singh Mathuria Kaushal-DeepDepartment of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, 202002, India. drkdsm@gmail.com.
Afzal AneesDepartment of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, 202002, India.
Shehtaj KhanDepartment of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, 202002, India.
Mohammad Amanullah KhanDepartment of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, 202002, India.
Mehershree LodhiDepartment of Anesthesia, Institute of Medical Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 22100, India.
Aligarh Muslim University · INJawaharlal Nehru Medical College Hospital · INBanaras Hindu University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarlier studies done to compare the efficacy of use of local anesthetics at intraperitoneal location versus intraincisional use had utilized equal amount of drugs at the two locations, usually 10-20 ml. Using this large amount of drug in the small space of intraincisional location as compared to similar amount of drug in large intraperitoneal space created an inadvertent bias in favor of patients receiving the drug intraincisionally so these patients naturally experienced less pain. AIMS AND

objectivesTo conduct a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled study by standardizing dose of local anesthetic, to compare the effectiveness of intraperitoneal against intraincisional use of ropivacaine 0.2% for post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain relief. MATERIALS AND

methods294 patients underwent elective 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were triple blindly randomized. All patients received ~ 23 ml of solution, of which 20 ml was given intraperitoneally (1 ml/cm; 16 ml along right hemi-dome and 4 ml in gall bladder fossa) and ~ 3 ml intraincisionally (1 ml/cm of length of incision). Solution was either normal saline or drug (0.2% ropivacaine) depending on the group [controls (n = 86), intraperitoneal group (n = 100), and intraincisional group (n = 108)]. 5 different pain scales were used for assessment of overall pain. Pain scores were assessed at 5 points of time.

resultsPatients in intraincisional group showed significantly less overall pain and rescue analgesia requirement (p < 0.05). Intraincisional group showed significantly less overall pain (p < 0.05) as compared to intraperitoneal group; however, use of rescue analgesia was comparable in the two groups (p > 0.05); and shoulder pain was significantly less in intraperitoneal group (p < 0.05).

conclusionThe intraincisional use of injection ropivacaine at its minimum concentration of 0.2% in minimal doses of 1 ml/cm at the end of procedure provides significantly more post-operative analgesia as compared to intraperitoneal group and controls. However, for controlling shoulder pain, the use of intraperitoneal ropivacaine is desirable.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceAnesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPostoperative PainRopivacaineAnesthetics, LocalRopivacaineIntraincisional infiltrationIntraperitoneal instillationLocal anesthesiaPost-laparoscopic cholecystectomy painRescue analgesiaRopivacaineShoulder pain

Identifiers

PMID29340809
OpenAlexW2783727572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.