Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29340767›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2018

Analysis of prognostic factors after resection of solitary liver metastasis in colorectal cancer: a 22-year bicentre study.

Sara Acciuffi, Frank Meyer, Astrid Bauschke, Utz Settmacher, Hans Lippert, Roland Croner, Annelore Altendorf-Hofmann

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara AcciuffiDepartment of General, Abdominal and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9487-2197
Frank MeyerDepartment of General, Abdominal and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Astrid BauschkeDepartment of General, Abdominal and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Utz SettmacherDepartment of General, Abdominal and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Hans LippertDepartment of General, Abdominal and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Roland CronerDepartment of General, Abdominal and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.
Annelore Altendorf-HofmannDepartment of General, Abdominal and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany. annelore.altendorf-hofmann@gmx.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe investigation of the predictors of outcome after hepatic resection for solitary colorectal liver metastasis.

methodsWe recruited 350 patients with solitary colorectal liver metastasis at the University Hospitals of Jena and Magdeburg, who underwent curative liver resection between 1993 and 2014. All patients had follow-up until death or till summer 2016.

resultsThe follow-up data concern 96.6% of observed patients. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 47 and 28%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates were 30 and 20%, respectively. The analysis of the prognostic factors revealed that the pT category of primary tumour, size and grade of the metastasis and extension of the liver resection had no statistically significant impact on survival and recurrence rates. In multivariate analysis, age, status of lymph node metastasis at the primary tumour, location of primary tumour, time of appearance of the metastasis, the use of preoperative chemotherapy and the presence of extrahepatic tumour proved to be independent statistically significant predictors for the prognosis. Moreover, patients with rectal cancer had a lower intrahepatic recurrence rate, but a higher extrahepatic recurrence rate.

conclusionThe long-term follow-up of patients with R0-resected liver metastasis is multifactorially influenced. Age and comorbidity have a role only in the overall survival. More than three lymph node metastasis reduced both the overall and disease-free survival. Extrahepatic tumour had a negative influence on the extrahepatic recurrence and on the overall survival. Neither overall survival nor recurrence rates was improved using neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeColorectal cancerLiver metastasisPrognostic factorsSolitary colorectal metastasis

Identifiers

PMID29340767
PMCPMC11813267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.