Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29340541›Full record

SynthesisRevista Brasileira de terapia intensiva

Safety criteria to start early mobilization in intensive care units. Systematic review.

Thais Martins Albanaz da Conceição, Ana Inês Gonzáles, Fernanda Cabral Xavier Sarmento de Figueiredo, Danielle Soares Rocha Vieira, Daiana Cristine Bündchen

Open access · diamondAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Saudi Guideline for Mechanical Ventilation in Adults.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Improving Mobility in Critically Ill Patients in a Tertiary Care ICU: Opportunities and Challenges.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thais Martins Albanaz da ConceiçãoHospital Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Florianópolis (SC), Brasil.
Ana Inês GonzálesDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Araranguá, (SC), Brasil.
Fernanda Cabral Xavier Sarmento de FigueiredoHospital Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Florianópolis (SC), Brasil.
Danielle Soares Rocha VieiraDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Araranguá, (SC), Brasil.
Daiana Cristine BündchenDepartamento de Fisioterapia, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - Araranguá, (SC), Brasil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRPolydoro Ernani de São Thiago University Hospital · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobilization of critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units should be performed based on safety criteria. The aim of the present review was to establish which safety criteria are most often used to start early mobilization for patients under mechanical ventilation admitted to intensive care units. Articles were searched in the PubMed, PEDro, LILACS, Cochrane and CINAHL databases; randomized and quasi-randomized clinical trials, cohort studies, comparative studies with or without simultaneous controls, case series with 10 or more consecutive cases and descriptive studies were included. The same was performed regarding prospective, retrospective or cross-sectional studies where safety criteria to start early mobilization should be described in the Methods section. Two reviewers independently selected potentially eligible studies according to the established inclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the studies' methodological quality. Narrative description was employed in data analysis to summarize the characteristics and results of the included studies; safety criteria were categorized as follows: cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, orthopedic and other. A total of 37 articles were considered eligible. Cardiovascular safety criteria exhibited the largest number of variables. However, respiratory safety criteria exhibited higher concordance among studies. There was greater divergence among the authors regarding neurological criteria. There is a need to reinforce the recognition of the safety criteria used to start early mobilization for critically ill patients; the parameters and variables found might contribute to inclusion into service routines so as to start, make progress and guide clinical practice.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEarly AmbulationIntensive Care UnitsCritical CareHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiration, ArtificialTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29340541
PMCPMC5764564
OpenAlexW2782220391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.