Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29340322›Full record

ArticleKidney international reports2018

Paricalcitol Versus Calcifediol for Treating Hyperparathyroidism in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Josep M Cruzado, Ricardo Lauzurica, Julio Pascual, Roberto Marcen, Francesc Moreso, Alex Gutierrez-Dalmau, Amado Andrés, Domingo Hernández, Armando Torres, Maria Isabel Beneyto and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney international reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Josep M CruzadoNephrology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Ricardo LauzuricaDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain.
Julio PascualDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
Roberto MarcenDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Francesc MoresoHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Nephrology, Barcelona, Spain.
Alex Gutierrez-DalmauDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Amado AndrésDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Domingo HernándezDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain.
Armando TorresDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain.
Maria Isabel BeneytoDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital Universitari La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Edoardo MelilliNephrology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna ManonellesNephrology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Manuel AriasNephrology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Manuel PragaDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital Doctor José Molina Orosa · ESHospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESHospital Universitario de Canarias · ESHospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSecondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) and vitamin D deficiency are common at kidney transplantation and are associated with some early and late complications. This study was designed to evaluate whether paricalcitol was more effective than nutritional vitamin D for controlling SHPT in

methodsThis was a 6-month, investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial. Patients with pretransplantation iPTH between 250 and 600 pg/ml and calcium <10 mg/dl were randomized to paricalcitol (PAR) or calcifediol (CAL). The intention-to-treat population (PAR: n = 46; CAL: n = 47) was used for the analysis. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with serum iPTH >110 pg/ml at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were bone mineral metabolism, renal function, and allograft protocol biopsies.

resultsThe primary outcome occurred in 19.6% of patients in the PAR group and 36.2% of patients in the CAL group (

conclusionBoth PAR and CAL reduced iPTH, but PAR was associated with a higher proportion of patients with iPTH <70 pg/ml. These results do not support the use of PAR to treat posttransplantation hyperparathyroidism.

Indexed as

hyperparathyroidismkidney transplantationparicalcitolvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID29340322
PMCPMC5762965
OpenAlexW2758604354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.