Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29340286›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2018

Cancer imaging phenomics toolkit: quantitative imaging analytics for precision diagnostics and predictive modeling of clinical outcome.

Christos Davatzikos, Saima Rathore, Spyridon Bakas, Sarthak Pati, Mark Bergman, Ratheesh Kalarot, Patmaa Sridharan, Aimilia Gastounioti, Nariman Jahani, Eric Cohen and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Christos DavatzikosCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Saima RathoreCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Spyridon BakasCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8734-6482
Sarthak PatiCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2243-8487
Mark BergmanCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Ratheesh KalarotCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Patmaa SridharanCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Aimilia GastouniotiCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3359-7195
Nariman JahaniCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Eric CohenCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Hamed AkbariCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Birkan TuncCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Jimit DoshiCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Drew ParkerCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Michael HsiehCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Aristeidis SotirasCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0795-8820
Hongming LiCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6934-1928
Yangming OuMassachusetts General Hospital, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Robert K DootCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1747-239X
Michel BilelloCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Yong FanCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Russell T ShinoharaCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Paul YushkevichCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Ragini VermaCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Despina KontosCenter for Biomedical Image Computing and Analytics (CBICA), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9031-5126

Funding

Statistical atlases of brain tumor MRI:do imaging phenotypes predict progression?R01NS042645 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2002 to 2024
$8.7M
Effect of Breast Density on Screening Recall with Digital Breast TomosynthesisR01CA161749 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KONTOS, DESPINA · 2012 to 2021
$3.6M
Cancer imaging phenomics software suite: application to brain and breast cancerU24CA189523 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS, KONTOS, DESPINA · 2015 to 2019
$3.2M
Connectomics meets neuro-oncology: mapping the brain for treatment planningR01NS096606 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BREM, STEVEN, VERMA, RAGINI · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
Multi-parametric 4-D Imaging Biomarkers for Neoadjuvant Treatment ResponseR01CA197000 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KONTOS, DESPINA · 2016 to 2020
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA161749NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197000NCI NIH HHS U24 CA189523NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS042645NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS096606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growth of multiparametric imaging protocols has paved the way for quantitative imaging phenotypes that predict treatment response and clinical outcome, reflect underlying cancer molecular characteristics and spatiotemporal heterogeneity, and can guide personalized treatment planning. This growth has underlined the need for efficient quantitative analytics to derive high-dimensional imaging signatures of diagnostic and predictive value in this emerging era of integrated precision diagnostics. This paper presents cancer imaging phenomics toolkit (CaPTk), a new and dynamically growing software platform for analysis of radiographic images of cancer, currently focusing on brain, breast, and lung cancer. CaPTk leverages the value of quantitative imaging analytics along with machine learning to derive phenotypic imaging signatures, based on two-level functionality. First, image analysis algorithms are used to extract comprehensive panels of diverse and complementary features, such as multiparametric intensity histogram distributions, texture, shape, kinetics, connectomics, and spatial patterns. At the second level, these quantitative imaging signatures are fed into multivariate machine learning models to produce diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers. Results from clinical studies in three areas are shown: (i) computational neuro-oncology of brain gliomas for precision diagnostics, prediction of outcome, and treatment planning; (ii) prediction of treatment response for breast and lung cancer, and (iii) risk assessment for breast cancer.

Indexed as

cancer imaging phenomicsopen source softwareprecision diagnosticsradiogenomicsradiomicstreatment response

Identifiers

PMID29340286
PMCPMC5764116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.