Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29340278›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational internal medicine2017

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage with Lumen-apposing Metal Stents or Plastic Double-pigtail Stents: A Multifactorial Analysis.

Nan Ge, Jinlong Hu, Siyu Sun, Enqiang Linghu, Zhendong Jin, Zhaoshen Li

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational internal medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nan GeEndoscopy center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang110004, Liaoning Province, China.
Jinlong HuEndoscopy center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang110004, Liaoning Province, China.
Siyu SunEndoscopy center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang110004, Liaoning Province, China.
Enqiang LinghuDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhendong JinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Zhaoshen LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, the Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
China Medical University · CNSecond Military Medical University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficiency of plastic and metal stents for symptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst (PP) drainage and analyze other main associated factors that affect the outcome of drainage therapy.

methodRates of technical and clinical success, procedure-related side effects (hemorrhage, stent migration, and cyst rupture), reinterventions, and duration of hospital stay.

resultsThere were 52 patients, 40 patients underwent plastic stent placement and 12 patients underwent lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) placement. The total rate of technical success was 100%. The total rate of clinical success was 100%. The total rate of adverse events was 7.7% (4/52). On multiple logistic regression analysis, the use of plastic stents (

conclusionBoth plastic and LAMSs are proven to be highly efficient in PP drainage. The LAMS is superior in preventing complications such as migration and cyst leakage and reducing the rate of reintervention.

Indexed as

endoscopic ultrasoundlumen-apposing metal stentspancreatic pseudocystplastic double pigtail stents

Identifiers

PMID29340278
PMCPMC5767711
OpenAlexW2786088394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.