ReviewArchives of physiotherapy2016
Patient-reported outcome measures for non-specific neck pain validated in the Italian-language: a systematic review.
Review in Archives of physiotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural and Psychometric Properties of Neck Pain Questionnaires Through Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Are Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Distal Radius Fractures Validated for Spanish and Culture? A Systematic Review.The Journal of hand surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Comparison of Traditional Chinese Manual Therapy (Tuina) and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Patients With Nonspecific Neck Pain: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Trial
- The Effects of Manual Therapy with TECAR Therapy, on Pain, Disability and Range of Motion in Women with Non-specific Chronic Neck Pain.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Article
- Adaption and psychometric evaluation of the Hindi version of Neck Disability Index in the rural population of Northern India: A cross cultural study.F1000Research · 2023Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Dutch language version of the Pictorial Fear of Activity Scale - Cervical.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2020Article
- Rasch analysis of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Turkish version, validity, and reliability studyTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2019Article
- Development, validity and reliability of the Italian version of the Copenhagen neck functional disability scale.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient-reported outcome measures can improve the management of patients with non-specific neck pain. The choice of measure greatly depends on its content and psychometric properties. Most questionnaires were developed for English-speaking people, and need to undergo cross-cultural validation for use in different language contexts. To help Italian clinicians select the most appropriate tool, we systematically reviewed the validated Italian-language outcome measures for non-specific neck pain, and analyzed their psychometric properties and clinical utility.
methodsThe search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. All articles published in English or Italian regarding the development, translation, or validation of patient-reported outcome measures available in the Italian language were included. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the COSMIN checklist.
resultsOut of 4891articles screened, 66 were eligible. Overall, they were of poor or fair methodological quality. Four instruments measuring function and disability (Neck Disability Index, Neck Pain and Disability Scale, Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire, and Core Outcome Measures Index), and one measuring activity-related fear of movement (NeckPix©) were identified. Each scale showed some psychometric weaknesses or problems with functioning, and none emerged as a gold standard.
conclusionsSeveral patient-reported outcome measures are now available for assessing Italian people with non-specific neck pain. While the Neck Disability Index is the one most widely used, the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire appears the most promising tool from a psychometric point of view.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.