Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29339960›Full record

ArticleNeuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press)2017

Which Differences in Priming Effect Between Neglect and Hemianopia? A Case Description of a Bilateral Brain-Lesioned Patient.

Matteo Sozzi, Stefania Bianchi Marzoli, Lisa Melzi, Massimo Corbo, Irene Venturella, Michela Balconi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-ophthalmology (Aeolus Press), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Matteo SozziDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa Cura Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Stefania Bianchi MarzoliDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa Cura Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Lisa MelziDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa Cura Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Massimo CorboDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa Cura Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Irene VenturellaDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Michela BalconiDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely known that visuospatial neglect and hemianopia maybe superimposed. We considered the differences in implicit information processing which is effective in patients with neglect but not with hemianopia. We then hypothesize that a prime-word in the neglected field should determine a semantic activation effect but not in a blind hemifield. Moreover eye movements could provide further details. In this work we considered a patient with a bilateral with the presence of either a left visual neglect and a right homonymous hemianopia. Our results supported implicit information processing in the space affected by neglect but not by hemianopia.

Indexed as

Eye movementshemianopianeglectsemantic priming

Identifiers

PMID29339960
PMCPMC5762176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.