Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29339512›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Neural preservation underlies speech improvement from auditory deprivation in young cochlear implant recipients.

Gangyi Feng, Erin M Ingvalson, Tina M Grieco-Calub, Megan Y Roberts, Maura E Ryan, Patrick Birmingham, Delilah Burrowes, Nancy M Young, Patrick C M Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. EEG neurosubtyping of infants predicts language trajectories.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Research and application progress in deep learning in otology.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gangyi FengDepartment of Linguistics and Modern Languages, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Erin M IngvalsonSchool of Communication Science and Disorders, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32301.ORCID 0000-0002-5498-2543
Tina M Grieco-CalubRoxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.
Megan Y RobertsRoxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208.
Maura E RyanDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611.
Patrick BirminghamDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611.
Delilah BurrowesDepartment of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611.
Nancy M YoungDepartment of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611.ORCID 0000-0003-1498-2984
Patrick C M WongDepartment of Linguistics and Modern Languages, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; p.wong@cuhk.edu.hk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although cochlear implantation enables some children to attain age-appropriate speech and language development, communicative delays persist in others, and outcomes are quite variable and difficult to predict, even for children implanted early in life. To understand the neurobiological basis of this variability, we used presurgical neural morphological data obtained from MRI of individual pediatric cochlear implant (CI) candidates implanted younger than 3.5 years to predict variability of their speech-perception improvement after surgery. We first compared neuroanatomical density and spatial pattern similarity of CI candidates to that of age-matched children with normal hearing, which allowed us to detail neuroanatomical networks that were either affected or unaffected by auditory deprivation. This information enables us to build machine-learning models to predict the individual children's speech development following CI. We found that regions of the brain that were unaffected by auditory deprivation, in particular the auditory association and cognitive brain regions, produced the highest accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity in patient classification and the most precise prediction results. These findings suggest that brain areas unaffected by auditory deprivation are critical to developing closer to typical speech outcomes. Moreover, the findings suggest that determination of the type of neural reorganization caused by auditory deprivation before implantation is valuable for predicting post-CI language outcomes for young children.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsBrain MappingChildChild, PreschoolDeafnessFemaleHearingHumansLanguage DevelopmentMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, NeurologicalMultivariate AnalysisNerve Netauditory deprivationcochlear implantmachine learningneural preservationprediction

Identifiers

PMID29339512
PMCPMC5798370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.